Show simple item record

A Critical Look at Critics in HTN Planning

dc.contributor.authorErol, Kutluhanen_US
dc.contributor.authorHendler, James A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNau, D.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTsuneto, R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-05-23T09:59:07Z
dc.date.available2007-05-23T09:59:07Z
dc.date.issued1995en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/5637
dc.description.abstractDetecting interactions and resolving conflicts in one of the key issues for generative planning systems. Hierarchical Task Network (HTN) planning systems use critics for this purpose. Critics have provided extra efficiency and flexibility to HTN planning systems, but their procedural -- and sometimes domain- specific - - nature has not been amenable to analytical studies. As a result, little work is available on the correctness or efficiency of critics. This paper describes a principled approach to handling conflicts, as implemented in UMCP, an HTN planning system. Critics in UMCP have desirable properties such as systematicity, and the preservation of soundness and completeness.en_US
dc.format.extent740456 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesISR; TR 1995-49en_US
dc.subjectalgorithmsen_US
dc.subjectknowledge representationen_US
dc.subjectplanningen_US
dc.subjectSystems Integration Methodologyen_US
dc.titleA Critical Look at Critics in HTN Planningen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.contributor.departmentISRen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record