University of Maryland LibrariesDigital Repository at the University of Maryland
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DRUM
    • School of Public Policy
    • Public Policy
    • Public Policy Research Works
    • View Item
    •   DRUM
    • School of Public Policy
    • Public Policy
    • Public Policy Research Works
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The Economics of Reprocessing vs. Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Final Report (1.083Mb)
    No. of downloads: 1672

    Data: BUP-FBR (46Kb)
    No. of downloads: 587

    Data: BUP-LWR (95.5Kb)
    No. of downloads: 464

    Data: COE-FBR (40.5Kb)
    No. of downloads: 530

    Data: COE-LWR (94Kb)
    No. of downloads: 529

    Date
    2003-12
    Author
    Fetter, Steve
    Bunn, Matthew
    Holdren, John P.
    van der Zwaan, Bob
    Citation
    Matthew Bunn, Steve Fetter, John P. Holdren and Bob van der Zwaan, The Economics of Reprocessing vs. Direct Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel (Cambridge, MA: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, December 2003), 127 pgs
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This report assesses the economics of reprocessing versus direct disposal of spent nuclear fuel. The breakeven uranium price at which reprocessing spent nuclear fuel from existing light-water reactors (LWRs) and recycling the resulting plutonium and uranium in LWRs would become economic is assessed, using central estimates of the costs of different elements of the nuclear fuel cycle (and other fuel cycle input parameters), for a wide range of range of potential reprocessing prices. Sensitivity analysis is performed, showing that the conclusions reached are robust across a wide range of input parameters. The contribution of direct disposal or reprocessing and recycling to electricity cost is also assessed. The choice of particular central estimates and ranges for the input parameters of the fuel cycle model is justified through a review of the relevant literature. The impact of different fuel cycle approaches on the volume needed for geologic repositories is briefly discussed, as are the issues surrounding the possibility of performing separations and transmutation on spent nuclear fuel to reduce the need for additional repositories. A similar analysis is then performed of the breakeven uranium price at which deploying fast-neutron breeder reactors would become competitive compared with a once-through fuel cycle in LWRs, for a range of possible differences in capital cost between LWRs and fast-neutron reactors. Sensitivity analysis is again provided, as are an analysis of the contribution to electricity cost, and a justification of the choices of central estimates and ranges for the input parameters. The equations used in the economic model are derived and explained in an appendix. Another appendix assesses the quantities of uranium likely to be recoverable worldwide in the future at a range of different possible future prices.
    Notes
    Excel spreadsheets used to calculate the breakeven uranium price and the cost of electricity also available. (See appendix A for details)
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1903/4043
    Collections
    • Public Policy Research Works

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DRUMCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister
    Pages
    About DRUMAbout Download Statistics

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility