Sewer System Alternatives Evaluation for Potential Creswell Area Expansion in Harford County

View/ Open
Date
2018Author
Alarcon, Julio
McAllister, Nicholas
Furlong, Brian
Benyarku, Eben
Carter, Alonzo
Hall, Courtney
Belay, Mengistu
Cho, Andrew (Seong)
Kaur, Gurpreet
Islam, Sanjidul
Batista, Sabrina
Lucki, Alexandra
Bloemendaal, Kim
Gonzalez, Raul Castillo
McElhaney, Matthew
Diwani, Souhayl
Reister, Ben
Clark, Phillip
Tokar, Jayne
Schachter, Greg
Tyshing, Miguel
Berhane, Michael
McKenna, Eric
Krasnoff, Gregory
SyedNaveed, Mishaal
Siegel, Evan
Shuey, Joe
Milligan, Austin
Miranda, Mario
Moez, Yasmin
Queen, Michael
Tolnay, Sara
Wink, Pete
Schito, Gabriella
O'Neal, Jeff
Drumm, Lauren
Alvarez-Couceiro, Nico
Dougen, Graham
Radstake, Damiaen
Reisfeld, Daniel
Berger, Eli
Streett, Rebecca
Palumbo, Emily
Hoover, Madeline
Blout, Tim
Sage, Madison
Holtzman, William
Sultan, Robin
Mayer, Erik
Nachenberg, Koby
Lynch, Sadie
Advisor
Cui, Qingbin
DRUM DOI
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This report summarizes the findings of the ENCE422 Fall 2018 class term project. Students were
tasked with evaluating sewer system alternatives for the Creswell area expansion in Harford
County. Student groups were to consider environmental impacts, community/social impacts,
and perform financial analysis for the alternatives they chose to evaluate. This report extracts
information from 14 separate team presentations and synthesizes it around the following
structure; 1. Systems that Utilize Septic Tanks
a. Traditional Septic System
b. Orenco Effluent System
c. Small Diameter Gravity Sewer System
2. System that Do Not Utilize Septic Tanks
a. Traditional Gravity System
b. Vacuum System
c. Grinder Pump System
Notes
Final project for ENCE422: Project Cost Accounting and Economics (Fall 2018).
University of Maryland, College Park.