Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBaur, Cynthia
dc.contributor.authorMartinez, Lourdes M.
dc.contributor.authorTchangalova, Nedelina
dc.contributor.authorRubin, Don
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-13T17:02:23Z
dc.date.available2017-12-13T17:02:23Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-19
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/M2W66996Q
dc.identifier.citationBaur, C., Martinez, L. M., Tchangalova, N. & Rubin, D. (2017). A review and report of community-based health literacy interventions. Presentation and paper at Roundtable on Health Literacy, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, D.C. Available at http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Activities/PublicHealth/HealthLiteracy/2017-JUL-19.aspxen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/20238
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: A scoping literature review was conducted to identify and describe the state-of the-art of community-based health literacy interventions. “Health literacy” and “community” were the core concepts used to identify relevant interventions for review and analysis. “Health literacy,” “community” and “community-based” are terms with a range of meanings, and the review aimed to find and report those interventions that intentionally brought together groups of people to participate in an intervention that addressed health literacy issues or tried to change health literacy skills, behaviors, status, or other outcomes as defined by researchers. METHODS: Literature searching was conducted using PubMed, selected EBSCO and Proquest databases, as well as Web of Science for relevant studies. Grey literature was searched on web sites to identify eligible community-based programs. Search results were limited to English publications from June 2010 to 2017, however no limit was applied to geographical location, participants, health topic, or intervention type. Two authors screened titles and abstracts and identified 170 references suitable for full-text analysis. Papers were reviewed using a standard template with descriptive categories about the intervention; and criteria from the CDC “Best Practices” for evidence-based practices and Guide to Community Preventive Services study designs. RESULTS: Of the 2,402 papers located with the search strategy, 74 papers met the inclusion criteria. Of the included papers, 55 reported that intervention communities were selected because of health literacy concerns; 63 reported that health literacy principles or techniques were used for content or program development; 54 used health literacy measures; and 53 included health literacy outcome information. Only two papers reported large magnitude effects. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of community-based health literacy interventions provide qualitative and quantitative evidence of positive outcomes; knowledge change was the most common outcome. Interventions can be strengthened in a number of ways to continue to build the body of knowledge about when and how to best address health literacy in community interventions.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was commissioned by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, Health and Medicine Division, Roundtable on Health Literacyen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNational Academy of Sciencesen_US
dc.subjecthealth literacyen_US
dc.subjectcommunityen_US
dc.subjectcommunity-based interventionsen_US
dc.titleA Review and Report of Community-based Health Literacy Interventionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_us
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland Librariesen_us
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland (College Park, MD)en_us


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record