Show simple item record

Soil microbial processes and community structure in natural and restored tidal freshwater wetlands of the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, USA

dc.contributor.advisorYarwood, Stephane A.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorBaldwin, Andrew H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMaietta, Christine E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-22T06:10:43Z
dc.date.available2017-06-22T06:10:43Z
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/M2C002
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/19427
dc.description.abstractTidal freshwater wetlands are integral to downstream water quality because they capture, store, and transform nutrients. Unfortunately, anthropogenic stressors are negatively impacting these habitats. While wetland restoration is helping to reinstate their presence in the landscape, restored wetlands frequently differ physically, chemically, and biologically from their natural counterparts. This research examined plant, soil, and microbe relationships and how their interactions affect soil carbon (C) storage and cycling in natural and restored tidal freshwater wetlands of the Chesapeake Bay, MD, USA. This research yielded important findings regarding differences between natural and restored habitats. First, we discovered soil microbial community composition of an urban tidal freshwater wetland retained similar composition as their less disturbed, suburban counterpart, and wetland sites constructed using similar restoration methodology produced similar microbial community structure and soil function. Additional research revealed that a natural and a restored wetland store soil C quite differently: A majority of soil C in the natural site was associated with large macroaggregates (> 2000 μm) whereas most soil C in the restored site was associated with smaller macroaggregates (> 250 to < 2000 μm). The distributions of six chemical compound classes (i.e., carboxylics, cyclics, aliphatics, lignin derivatives, carbohydrates derivatives, N-containing compounds) were relatively similar across the five soil fractions from both sites, however. In the final study, anaerobic laboratory mesocosms were used to evaluate the effects of clay content (%) and leaf litter quality on soil C cycling processes over time. This study found restored soils, regardless of clay content, mineralized more C as carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) compared to natural wetland soils. Natural soils respired approximately half the volume of gas as restored soils, suggesting the addition of high- or low-quality C substrates to low C systems elicit a greater response from the heterotrophic microbial community. The results of these three studies suggest site history and edaphic features of restored wetlands are important drivers of microbial communities and their function. We propose that practitioners and researchers work together to identify practices that will enhance soil functions, particularly C storage, in tidal freshwater wetlands of the Chesapeake Bay region.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleSoil microbial processes and community structure in natural and restored tidal freshwater wetlands of the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, USAen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentEnvironmental Science and Technologyen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEnvironmental scienceen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledMicrobiologyen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEcologyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledBiogeochemistryen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledCarbonen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledMicrobial Ecologyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledSoilen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledSoil Organic Matteren_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledTidal Freshwater Wetlandsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record