Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChambers, Robert Gen_US
dc.contributor.authorMinegishi, Kotaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-16T05:35:36Z
dc.date.available2014-10-16T05:35:36Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/M2Q607
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/15891
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation proposes three new methodologies in empirical production economics for assessing technical change, production risks, and technological frontiers. Each methodology is demonstrated with an application to Maryland dairy operations, with an emphasis on comparing production technologies between confinement and management-intensive grazing (MIG) dairy systems. The rapid decline of small to medium scale dairies has made the study of alternative dairy production like MIG politically and socially important. The first essay develops a regression-based approach to the Malmquist productivity index (MPI) decomposition that attributes production heterogeneity to technical change (i.e., shifts of technological frontiers) and technical efficiency change (i.e., shifts of technical efficiency). Unlike the conventional, producer-level decomposition measures, the proposed method obtains sample-level decomposition measures, for which the researcher can fully utilize unbalanced panel data and control for the influence of potentially-confounding non-production factors. The results find 1.3% and 0.6% annual technical change during 1995-2009 for confinement and grazers respectively. For both dairy systems, farm ownership and off-farm income are positively and negatively associated with technical efficiency respectively. The second essay considers an empirical application of the state-contingent (SC) approach to production risks. In the context of agricultural production, uncertainty in the SC framework is defined over distinct weather events or market conditions, for which the producer is assumed to prepare a portfolio of SC production outcomes. This study shows how production data over multiple years can be regarded as multiple draws from the contingent states of nature, by which SC technologies can be approximated by Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The results suggest that optimal production decisions for a moderate-to-maximally risk-averse producer have become riskier for the confinement system and less risky for the grazing system. The third essay proposes a refinement of the DEA frontier approximation by integrating the concepts of technical, allocative, and scale inefficiencies. Technology is estimated in the form of a weighted-average of the benchmarking-frontiers that are associated with these inefficiency concepts. In the current dataset, the proposed method finds 7.5% to 9.2% higher mean-technical efficiency than the standard practice, indicating the increased discriminatory power in efficiency analysis.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleEssays on the Comparison of Production Technologies: Applications to Maryland Dairy Farmsen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentAgricultural and Resource Economicsen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledAgriculture economicsen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledOperations researchen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledDairy Productionen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledData Envelopment Analysisen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledProduction Risksen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledState Contingent Productionen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledTechnical Changeen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledTechnical Eciencyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record