Show simple item record

"Easy Issues" in American Politics

dc.contributor.advisorMorris, Irwin L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCizmar, Anneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-07-07T05:36:02Z
dc.date.available2011-07-07T05:36:02Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/11649
dc.description.abstractMy dissertation explores Carmines' and Stimson's well-known and widely cited distinction between "easy" and "hard" issues as described in "The Two Faces of Issue Voting" (1980). They argue that some issues are inherently "easy," and are understood by the public at an emotional, "gut" level, while other issues are intrinsically "hard" and require greater political sophistication and interest to process. This theory is intuitively appealing and has been widely-accepted among political science scholars and pundits; however, many questions remain unanswered about this theory. In my dissertation I examine three primary questions---whether "easy" and "hard" issues exist, what are the sources of easiness, and how malleable is issue difficulty. I argue that economic and foreign policy issues, which are often regarded as "hard" are actually performance issues, and that issues are not inherently easy but are made so through political discourse. However, the ability to frame issues is not unlimited.en_US
dc.title"Easy Issues" in American Politicsen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentGovernment and Politicsen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledPolitical Scienceen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record