Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSchwartz, Charles Wen_US
dc.contributor.authorFick, Sarah Bethen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-19T07:14:41Z
dc.date.available2011-02-19T07:14:41Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/11267
dc.description.abstractThe American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) adopted the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) in 2008 and state agencies are now transitioning from the classical empirical procedures derived from the American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHO) Road Test. This thesis focuses on the practical implications of this transition: specifically, the changes to required pavement thickness. The AASHO Road Test pavement distress histories are compared against the MEPDG and AASHTO 1993 performance predictions using several performance measures (PSI, IRI, rutting, and cracking). No existing relationships from the literature were found to fit the AASHO Road Test recorded data so new relationships were developed to relate measured PSI to MEPDG predicted distresses. The findings, although somewhat inconclusive due to inherent difficulties in modeling the conditions at the Road Test for the MEPDG, suggest that the MEPDG predicts thinner pavement sections at higher traffic levels.en_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the AASHTO Empirical and Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Procedures Using the AASHO Road Testen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledTransportationen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledAASHO Road Testen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledAASHTO 1993en_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledMEPDGen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledPavement Designen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record