Show simple item record

Everything But "Censorship": How U.S. Newspapers Have Framed Student Free Speech and Press, 1969-2008

dc.contributor.advisorMoeller, Susanen_US
dc.contributor.authorFromm, Megan Elizabethen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-03T05:42:36Z
dc.date.available2010-07-03T05:42:36Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/10498
dc.description.abstractLegal scholars rarely focus on student First Amendment rights, and general public understanding of the extent of these rights is vague at best. While media scholars have focused much attention on newspaper coverage of more mainstream issues, no notable attention has been given to examining the way news media cover student First Amendment rights. As future leaders in a democracy, students at public schools are inculcated with notions of civic duty, independent thinking, and a respect for the freedoms that distinguish the U.S. from other countries. However, many public school students are consistently denied their rights to the very same freedoms they are expected to value. When students seek legal action to guarantee First Amendment protections, how U.S. newspapers frame these lawsuits and the students involved can greatly impact public perception of these issues. This study examines newspaper coverage of eight court cases that set precedent on student free speech and press rights. The cases are Tinker v. Des Moines, Papish v. Board of Curators, Healy v. James, Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, Kincaid v. Gibson, Dean v. Utica Community Schools, Hosty v. Carter, and Morse v. Frederick. Using a grounded theory approach and relying on agenda setting literature, a textual analysis of these eight court cases answers the central research question: How do U.S. newspapers frame high school and college students' right to freedom of speech and press? This study finds U.S. newspapers fail to adequately cover student First Amendment cases in four distinct ways. Most significantly, by framing the infringement of students' First Amendment rights as everything but "censorship," U.S. newspapers minimize students' claims and marginalize their positions.en_US
dc.titleEverything But "Censorship": How U.S. Newspapers Have Framed Student Free Speech and Press, 1969-2008en_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentJournalismen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledJournalismen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledLawen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolleddemocracyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledscholastic journalismen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledstudent freedom of pressen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledstudent freedom of speechen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledStudent journalistsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledstudent press lawen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record