Linguistics
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/2255
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item MODELING ADAPTABILITY MECHANISMS OF SPEECH PERCEPTION Nika Jurov(2024) Jurov, Nika; Feldman, Naomi H.; Idsardi, William; Linguistics; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)Speech is a complex, redundant and variable signal happening in a noisy and ever changing world. How do listeners navigate these complex auditory scenes and continuously and effortlessly understand most of the speakers around them? Studies show that listeners can quickly adapt to new situations, accents and even to distorted speech. Although prior research has established that listeners rely more on some speech cues (or also called features or dimensions) than others, it is yet not understood how listeners weight them flexibly on a moment-to-moment basis when the input might deviate from the standard speech. This thesis computationally explores flexible cue re-weighting as an adaptation mechanism using real speech corpora. The computational framework it relies on is rate distortion theory. This framework models a channel that is optimized on a trade off between distortion and rate: on the one hand, the input signal should be reconstructed with minimal error after it goes through the channel. On the other hand, the channel needs to extract parsimonious information from the incoming data. This channel can be implemented as a neural network with a beta variational auto-encoder. We use this model to show that two mechanistic components are needed for adaptation: focus and switch. We firstly show that focus on a cue mimics humans better than cue weights that simply depend on long term statistics as has been largely assumed in the prior research. And second, we show a new model that can quickly adapt and switch weighting the features depending on the input of a particular moment. This model's flexibility comes from implementing a cognitive mechanism that has been called ``selective attention" with multiple encoders. Each encoder serves as a focus on a different part of the signal. We can then choose how much to rely on each focus depending on the moment. Finally, we ask whether cue weighting is informed by being able to separate the noise from speech. To this end we adapt a feature disentanglement adversarial training from vision to disentangle speech (noise) features from noise (speech) labels. We show that although this does not give us human-like cue weighting behavior, there is an effect of disentanglement of weighting spectral information slightly more than temporal information compared to the baselines. Overall, this thesis explores adaptation computationally and offers a possible mechanistic explanation for ``selective attention'' with focus and switch mechanisms, based on rate distortion theory. It also argues that cue weighting cannot be determined solely on speech carefully articulated in laboratories or in quiet. Lastly, it explores a way to inform speech models from a cognitive angle to make the models more flexible and robust, like human speech perception is.Item Prosodic Structure as a Parallel to Musical Structure(2015) Heffner, Christopher C.; Slevc, L. RobertWhat structural properties do language and music share? Although early speculation identified a wide variety of possibilities, the literature has largely focused on the parallels between musical structure and syntactic structure. Here, we argue that parallels between musical structure and prosodic structure deserve more attention. We review the evidence for a link between musical and prosodic structure and find it to be strong. In fact, certain elements of prosodic structure may provide a parsimonious comparison with musical structure without sacrificing empirical findings related to the parallels between language and music. We then develop several predictions related to such a hypothesis.Item Bayesian Model of Categorical Effects in L1 and L2 Speech Processing(2014) Kronrod, Yakov; Feldman, Naomi; Linguistics; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)In this dissertation I present a model that captures categorical effects in both first language (L1) and second language (L2) speech perception. In L1 perception, categorical effects range between extremely strong for consonants to nearly continuous perception of vowels. I treat the problem of speech perception as a statistical inference problem and by quantifying categoricity I obtain a unified model of both strong and weak categorical effects. In this optimal inference mechanism, the listener uses their knowledge of categories and the acoustics of the signal to infer the intended productions of the speaker. The model splits up speech variability into meaningful category variance and perceptual noise variance. The ratio of these two variances, which I call Tau, directly correlates with the degree of categorical effects for a given phoneme or continuum. By fitting the model to behavioral data from different phonemes, I show how a single parametric quantitative variation can lead to the different degrees of categorical effects seen in perception experiments with different phonemes. In L2 perception, L1 categories have been shown to exert an effect on how L2 sounds are identified and how well the listener is able to discriminate them. Various models have been developed to relate the state of L1 categories with both the initial and eventual ability to process the L2. These models largely lacked a formalized metric to measure perceptual distance, a means of making a-priori predictions of behavior for a new contrast, and a way of describing non-discrete gradient effects. In the second part of my dissertation, I apply the same computational model that I used to unify L1 categorical effects to examining L2 perception. I show that we can use the model to make the same type of predictions as other SLA models, but also provide a quantitative framework while formalizing all measures of similarity and bias. Further, I show how using this model to consider L2 learners at different stages of development we can track specific parameters of categories as they change over time, giving us a look into the actual process of L2 category development.