A. James Clark School of Engineering
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/1654
The collections in this community comprise faculty research works, as well as graduate theses and dissertations.
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item A CAUSAL INFORMATION FUSION MODEL FOR ASSESSING PIPELINE INTEGRITY IN THE PRESENCE OF GROUND MOVEMENT(2024) Schell, Colin Andrew; Groth, Katrina M; Reliability Engineering; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)Pipelines are the primary transportation method for natural gas and oil in the United States making them critical infrastructure to maintain. However, ground movement hazards, such as landslides and ground subsidence, can deform pipelines and potentially lead to the release of hazardous materials. According to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), from 2004 to 2023, ground movement related pipeline failures resulted in $413M USD in damages. The dynamic nature of ground movement makes it necessary to collect pipeline and ground monitoring data and to actively model and predict pipeline integrity. Conventional stress-based methods struggle to predict pipeline failure in the presence of large longitudinal strains that result from ground movement. This has prompted many industry analysts to use strain-based design and assessment (SBDA) methods to manage pipeline integrity in the presence of ground movement. However, due to the complexity of ground movement hazards and their variable effects on pipeline deformation, current strain-based pipeline integrity models are only applicable in specific ground movement scenarios and cannot synthesize complementary data sources. This makes it costly and time-consuming for pipeline companies to protect their pipeline network from ground movement hazards. To close these gaps, this research made significant steps towards the development of a causal information fusion model for assessing pipeline integrity in a variety of ground movement scenarios that result in permanent ground deformation. We developed a causal framework that categorizes and describes how different risk-influencing factors (RIFs) affect pipeline reliability using academic literature, joint industry projects, PHMSA projects, pipeline data, and input from engineering experts. This framework was the foundation of the information fusion model which leverages SBDA methods, Bayesian network (BN) models, pipeline monitoring data, and ground monitoring data to calculate the probability of failure and the additional longitudinal strain needed to fail the pipeline. The information fusion model was then applied to several case studies with different contexts and data to compare model-based recommendations to the actions taken by decision makers. In these case studies, the proposed model leveraged the full extent of data available at each site and produced similar conclusions to those made by decision makers. These results demonstrate that the model could be used in a variety of ground movement scenarios that result in permanent ground deformation and exemplified the comprehensive insights that come from using an information fusion approach for assessing pipeline integrity. The proposed model lays the foundation for the development of advanced decision making tools that can enable operators to identify at-risk pipeline segments that require site specific integrity assessments and efficiently manage the reliability of their pipelines in the presence of ground movement.Item DEVELOPING HYBRID PHM MODELS FOR PIPELINE PITTING CORROSION, CONSIDERING DIFFERENT TYPES OF UNCERTAINTY AND CHANGES IN OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS(2019) Heidarydashtarjandi, Roohollah; Groth, Katrina M; Reliability Engineering; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)Pipelines are the most efficient and reliable way to transfer oil and gas in large quantities. Pipeline infrastructures represent a high capital investment and, if they fail, a source of environmental hazards and a potential threat to life. Among different pipeline failure mechanisms, pitting corrosion is of most concern because of the high growth rate of pits. In this dissertation two hybrid prognostics and health management (PHM) models are developed to evaluate degradation level of piggable pipelines, due to internal pitting corrosion. These models are able to incorporate multiple sensors data and physics of failure (POF) knowledge of internal pitting corrosion process. This dissertation covers both cases when in some pipeline's segments the pit density is low and in some segments it is high. In addition, it takes into account four types of uncertainty, including epistemic uncertainty, variability in the temporal aspects, spatial heterogeneity, and inspection errors. For a pipeline segment with a low pit density, a hybrid defect-based algorithm is developed to estimate probability distribution of maximum depth of each individual pit on that segment. This algorithm considers change in operational condition in internal pitting corrosion degradation modeling for the first time. In this way a two-phase similarity-based data fusion algorithm is developed to fuse POF knowledge, in-line inspection (ILI) and online inspection (OLI) data. In the first phase, a hierarchical Bayesian method based on a non-homogeneous gamma process is used to fuse POF knowledge and in-line inspection (ILI) data on multiple pits, and augmented particle filtering is used to fuse POF knowledge and online inspection (OLI) data of an active reference pit. The results are used to define a similarity index between each ILI pit and the OLI pit. In the second phase, this similarity index is used to generate dummy observations of depth for each ILI pit, based on the inspection data of the OLI pit. Those dummy observations are used in augmented particle filtering to estimate the remaining useful life (RUL) of that segment after the change in operational conditions when there is no new ILI data. For a pipeline segment with a high pit density, a hybrid population-based algorithm is developed to estimate the probability density function of maximum depth of the pit population on that segment. This algorithm eliminates the need of matching procedure that is computationally expensive and prone to error when the pit density is high. In this algorithm three types of measurement uncertainty including sizing error, probability of detection (POD), and probability of false call (POFC) are taken into account. In addition, initiation of new pits between the last ILI and a prediction time is modeled by using a homogeneous Poisson process. The non-linearity of the pitting corrosion process and the POF knowledge of this process is modeled by using a non-homogeneous gamma process. The estimation of these two algorithms are used in a series system to estimate the reliability of a long pipeline with multiple segments, when in some segments the pit density is low and in some segments it is high. The output of this research can be used to find the optimal maintenance action and time for each segment and the optimal next ILI time for the whole pipeline that eventually decreases the cost of unpredicted failures and unnecessary maintenance activities.