Mechanical Engineering

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Design and Validation of a Method to Characterize Human Interaction Variability
(MDPI, 2020-09-17) Cage, Kailyn; Vaughn-Cooke, Monifa; Fuge, Mark
Human interactions are paramount to the user experience, satisfaction, and risk of user errors. For products, anthropometry has traditionally been used in product sizing. However, structured methods that accurately map static and dynamic capabilities (e.g., functional mapping) of musculoskeletal regions for the conceptualization and redesign of product applications and use cases are limited. The present work aims to introduce and validate the effectiveness of the Interaction Variability method, which maps product components and musculoskeletal regions to determine explicit design parameters through limiting designer variation in the classification of human interaction factors. This study enrolled 16 engineering students to evaluate two series of interactions for (1) water bottle and (2) sunglasses applications enabling method validity and designer consistency assessments. For each interaction series, subjects identified and characterized product applications, components, and human interaction factors. Primary interactions, product mapping, and application identification achieved consensus between ranges of 31.25% and 100.00%, with significance (p < 0.1) observed at consensus rates of ≥75.00%. Significant levels of consistency were observed amongst designers, for at least one measure in all phases except anthropometric mapping for the sunglasses application indicating method effectiveness. Interaction variability was introduced and validated in this work as a standardized approach to identify, define, and map human and product interactions, which may reduce unintended use cases and user errors, respectively, in consumer populations.
Development of Low-Fidelity Virtual Replicas of Products for Usability Testing
(MDPI, 2022-07-08) Joyner, Janell S.; Kong, Aaron; Angelo, Julius; He, William; Vaughn-Cooke, Monifa
Designers perform early-stage formative usability tests with low-fidelity prototypes to improve the design of new products. This low-tech prototype style reduces the manufacturing resources but limits the functions that can be assessed. Recent advances in technology enable designers to create low-fidelity 3D models for users to engage in a virtual environment. Three-dimensional models communicate design concepts and are not often used in formative usability testing. The proposed method discusses how to create a virtual replica of a product by assessing key human interaction steps and addresses the limitations of translating those steps into a virtual environment. In addition, the paper will provide a framework to evaluate the usability of a product in a virtual setting, with a specific emphasis on low-resource online testing in the user population. A study was performed to pilot the subject’s experience with the proposed approach and determine how the virtual online simulation impacted the performance. The study outcomes demonstrated that subjects were able to successfully interact with the virtual replica and found the simulation realistic. This method can be followed to perform formative usability tests earlier and incorporate subject feedback into future iterations of their design, which can improve safety and product efficacy.
QUANTIFYING AND PREDICTING USER REPUTATION IN A NETWORK SECURITY CONTEXT
(2019) Gratian, Margaret Stephanie; Cukier, Michel; Reliability Engineering; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)
Reputation has long been an important factor for establishing trust and evaluating the character of others. Though subjective by definition, it recently emerged in the field of cybersecurity as a metric to quantify and predict the nature of domain names, IP addresses, files, and more. Implicit in the use of reputation to enhance cybersecurity is the assumption that past behaviors and opinions of others provides insight into the expected future behavior of an entity, which can be used to proactively identify potential threats to cybersecurity. Despite the plethora of work in industry and academia on reputation in cyberspace, proposed methods are often presented as black boxes and lack scientific rigor, reproducibility, and validation. Moreover, despite widespread recognition that cybersecurity solutions must consider the human user, there is limited work focusing on user reputation in a security context. This dissertation presents a mathematical interpretation of user cyber reputation and a methodology for evaluating reputation in a network security context. A user’s cyber reputation is defined as the most likely probability the user demonstrates a specific characteristic on the network, based on evidence. The methodology for evaluating user reputation is presented in three phases: characteristic definition and evidence collection; reputation quantification and prediction; and reputation model validation and refinement. The methodology is illustrated through a case study on a large university network, where network traffic data is used as evidence to determine the likelihood a user becomes infected or remains uninfected on the network. A separate case study explores social media as an alternate source of data for evaluating user reputation. User-reported account compromise data is collected from Twitter and used to predict if a user will self-report compromise. This case study uncovers user cybersecurity experiences and victimization trends and emphasizes the feasibility of using social media to enhance understandings of users from a security perspective. Overall, this dissertation presents an exploration into the complicated space of cyber identity. As new threats to security, user privacy, and information integrity continue to manifest, the need for reputation systems and techniques to evaluate and validate online identities will continue to grow.

Mechanical Engineering

Browse

Filters

Settings

Sort By

Results per page

Search Results