College of Education
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/1647
The collections in this community comprise faculty research works, as well as graduate theses and dissertations..
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item CHILDREN’S DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE AND FRIENDSHIP PREFERENCES IN GENDER STEREOTYPED CONTEXTS(2023) Sims, Riley N.; Killen, Melanie; Human Development; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)From an early age, children prefer fair and just treatment of others. Young children often reason about the importance of establishing equality between individuals and groups, with concerns for equity emerging by middle childhood. At the same time, children expect that individuals who counter gender stereotypic norms will face exclusion from the peer group, and give preferential treatment towards gender ingroup members over gender outgroup members in resource allocation tasks. Denying individuals from friendships, resources, or opportunities based on gender stereotypic expectations constitutes unfair treatment. Intergroup contact has been shown to reduce children’s prejudicial attitudes, but less research has investigated how intergroup contact with counter-stereotypic peers shapes children’s friendship preferences. Furthermore, research indicates that children rectify inequalities for historically marginalized racial/ethnic groups. Women have historically been marginalized and excluded within science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. Though some research has investigated the extent to which children rectify inequalities between racial groups, less research has focused on how children rectify inequalities between gender groups in stereotypic contexts, such as those involving science inequalities. The present dissertation contains three empirical papers that explore how gender stereotypic expectations shape children’s friendship preferences and distributive justice beliefs. Empirical Paper 1 explored how children’s own reported gender stereotypes and playmate experiences relate to their desires to play with peers who hold counter-stereotypic toy preferences. Empirical Paper 2 assessed children’s evaluations, resource allocation decisions, and reasoning in contexts involving inequalities of science supplies between groups of boys and girls. Empirical Paper 3 extended work from Empirical Paper 2 to investigate how children and young adults consider merit and gender group membership in science inequality contexts. Together, this body of work suggests that intergroup contact with counter-stereotypic peers can dampen the influence of gender stereotypes in shaping children’s friendship preferences, and that children and young adults maintain subtle pro-boy biases in their evaluations and decision-making regarding access to science resources between gender groups. Documenting the contextual factors that encourage children to resist gender stereotypic expectations and promote more equitable attitudes as it relates to rights to resources and opportunities can inform future research aimed at promoting inclusive orientations in childhood.Item CHILDREN’S CONCEPTIONS OF FAIRNESS: THE ROLE OF MENTAL STATE UNDERSTANDING AND GROUP IDENTITY(2021) D'Esterre, Alexander; Killen, Melanie; Human Development; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)Children’s everyday experiences occur against a backdrop that is rich in social information andwhich requires decisions involving considerations about fairness, intentionality, and social groups. With age, children improve in their ability to utilize intentional information in their judgments and have been shown to demonstrate preferences for fairness over group benefit. What has not been fully investigated is how children coordinate and weight these considerations at different ages. Moreover, mistaken intentions and a tendency to benefit the in-group over others can be seen even in adulthood – suggesting that these issues are not so easily overcome and have the potential to affect the evaluations and behaviors of individuals more than have been previously considered. Research designed to carefully investigate the impact of these social and cognitive factors on children’s fairness concepts can provide insight into the ways in which biases may begin to form and potentially inform our understanding of the underlying mechanisms present in prejudicial attitudes. The present dissertation contains a series of three empirical papers that are designed to investigate children’s responses to unintentional and intentional transgressions based on their cognitive ability to infer beliefs of others and their relationship to the group identity of the target. Empirical Study 1 demonstrated the value of using a morally-relevant theory of mind measure embedded directly into the context when predicting children’s responses to unintentional and intentional transgressions. Empirical Study 2 investigated the ways in which children’s assessment of fair and unfair advantages were influenced by the group identity of the character who created the advantage. Empirical Study 3 explored the types of retributive justice that children would endorse in light of various types of intentional and unintentional transgressions, revealing differences based on group identity and the impact that the retributive justice would present to the functioning of the group. The results of these studies together suggest that children’s fairness concepts are heavily influenced by the context in which children find themselves and are far from static. Better understanding the relationship between these factors will provide increased insight into the ways in which prejudice and bias may develop in childhood and suggest potential areas for intervention.