Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA)

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/10116

Browse

Author: search.filters.author.Lewis (aka Fehsenfeld), EvanSubject: search.filters.subject.Iran

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Assessing the Iran Deal
    (2015-09) Kull, Steven; Ramsay, Clay; Lewis (aka Fehsenfeld), Evan; Gallagher, Nancy; Pierce, Eric
    A majority of a national citizen advisory panel, made up of a representative sample of American registered voters, recommends Congress approve the deal recently negotiated between Iran, the United States and other permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (plus Germany) on Iran’s nuclear program. After assessing strong critiques of the terms of the deal – including rebuttals – and then evaluating the pros and cons of alternatives, 55 percent concluded that Congress should approve the agreement, despite serious concerns about some of its details. Twenty-three percent recommended ratcheting up sanctions instead, 14 percent favored renewing negotiations to get better terms, and 7 percent recommended threatening Iran with military strikes unless they agree to better terms.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Americans on Israel and the Iranian Nuclear Program: A Study of American Public Opinion
    (2012-03) Kull, Steven; Telhami, Shibley; Ramsey, Clay; Lewis (aka Fehsenfeld), Evan; Subias, Stefan
    These are the results of a poll of the American Public conducted by the Program on International Policy Attitudes and the Anwar Sadat Chair to better understand American public attitudes on Israel and the Iranian Nuclear Program.