Agriculture Law Education Initiative

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/15555

Browse

Filters

20152

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Moyle, Jon

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Privacy Issues and the Use of sUAS/Drones in Maryland
    (2015-11) Goeringer, Paul; Ellixson, Ashley; Moyle, Jon
    According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the lawful use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV), also known as Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), or more commonly as drones, are currently limited to military, research, and recreational applications. Under the FAA’s view, commercial uses of drones are illegal unless approved by the Federal government. This will change in the future. Congress authorized the FAA to develop regulations for the use of drones by private parties in the U.S by September 30, 2015 (FAA Modernization Act of 2012). FAA missed this deadline, but expects comprehensive regulations for drones to be completed by June 2016 (Jansen, 2015). History shows that the law rarely keeps up with technology. Courts often struggle when applying existing laws and previous rulings to modern technology. State legislatures can help clearly define some of the rules to guide courts in how to handle new technology. Drones have the potential to benefit producers (through crop and livestock monitoring), but they present new challenges as other groups begin to use the technology.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Taking Biosecurity Measures to Limit Your Legal Liability for the Spread of Avian Influenza
    (2015-09-17) Goeringer, Paul; Moyle, Jon; Newhall, Ashley
    The possibility of an avian influenza (AI) outbreak on the Delmarva is a scary possibility. The recent AI outbreak in the Midwest has resulted in the infection of over 48 million birds on 223 farms. Infected birds are euthanized to help contain the disease, resulting in large economic loss to both the grower and integrator. With this in mind, poultry growers and companies often have questions about potential liability if AI breaks out on one farm (Grower A) and then on a neighboring farm (Grower B). Could Grower A be liable to Grower B for damages caused by the disease? Under the traditional view, Grower A would not be liable for the spread of the disease unless it was shown that Grower A was negligent. Growers, poultry companies, and contractors practicing biosecurity measures can demonstrate he/she was not negligent and is working to prevent the spread of AI