Civil & Environmental Engineering

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/2221

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    USING A HIGH ORGANIC-MATTER PERMEABLE REACTIVE BARRIER TO REMEDIATE TRICHLOROETHYLENE-CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER AT THE BEAVER DAM ROAD LANDFILL
    (2018) Nino de Guzman, Gabriela Tejeda; Kjellerup, Birthe V; Torrents, Alba; Civil Engineering; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)
    Trichloroethylene (TCE) is an effective industrial degreaser and known carcinogen. It was frequently improperly disposed of and has become one of the most common groundwater and soil contaminants in the USA. Clean up continues to be difficult due to its physical and chemical properties. TCE and several of its degradation products were detected in the groundwater of the Beaver Dam Road Landfill (Beltsville, MD) at concentrations above their maximum contaminant levels (MCLs). The US Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service together with the University of Maryland, College Park and BMT Designers and Planners designed a permeable reactive barrier, or biowall, to remediate the contaminated groundwater. A series of batch reactor studies were conducted at 12°C to examine biowall fill-material combinations including the effects of zero-valent iron (ZVI) and glycerol amendments. Headspace samples were analyzed over the course of several months to monitor TCE degradation. An unamended, 4:3 mulch-to-compost combination was chosen based on no detectable TCE at the conclusion of the experiment. To increase the biowall degradation capacity, microbial infiltration and colonization of the structure were also studied. PCR, qPCR, and next-generation sequencing were used to survey the site’s indigenous population for dechlorinating clusters. Numerous clusters were identified affirming the use of the native population for bioaugmentation efforts. The ability of the biowall to support said community was investigated by monitoring continuously-fed column reactors containing biowall material spiked with a commercially-available, surrogate population, with and without a 5 mg/L dose of ZVI. The groundwater-fed column sans ZVI had the greatest Dehalococcoides population and while ZVI without biostimulation did decrease the overall population, it did not cause a statistically significant difference. Thus, if ZVI were to be used as a future biowall amendment, biostimulation would not be required to maintain a dechlorinating population. A sacrificial carbon source may be necessary to slow the biological degradation of the biowall’s organic fill-material. These findings will be utilized in future remediation and/or biowall expansion plans to fully employ the site’s natural resources. The biowall was constructed in July 2013 containing the 4:3 mulch-to-compost ratio and has reduced the upstream TCE concentration by ~90%.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Relating pollutant and water quality parameters to landuse in a subwatershed in the Choptank River watershed
    (2010) Nino de Guzman, Gabriela Tejeda; Torrents, Alba; Hapeman, Cathleen J; Civil Engineering; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)
    Agriculture and animal feeding operations have been implicated as sources of water pollution along the Choptank River, an estuary and tributary of the Chesapeake Bay. This survey examined a subwatershed within the Choptank River watershed for impacts of a poultry facility on its adjacent surface water. Water and sediment samples were collected May - October 2009 under mostly baseflow conditions and analyzed for antibiotics, nutrients, heavy metals, and selected bacteria. Of the antibiotics recovered, no significant difference was observed spatially, but a significant difference emerged between spring and fall/winter. For nutrients, the greatest phosphorus concentrations were at the subwatershed outlet (4) and at two branches not containing the poultry house (3 and 5); nitrogen concentrations at sites 2 and 5 were as high as site 4. Arsenic concentrations at 2 were lower than both the low-agriculture (control) site and a site neighboring 3. Bacterial counts in water and sediment remained fairly constant throughout the sampling regime.