Library Faculty/Staff Scholarship and Research
Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/11
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Connecting with Faculty Perceptions and Behaviors(2004-09-01T16:25:06Z) Hahn, KarlaThis Powerpoint presentation and accompanying bibliography were created for the Libraries as Digital Crossroads Tenth Annual Collection Development Symposium, May 19, 2003. The presentation summarizes the presenter's own research (with Irma Dillon) investigating University of Maryland Faculty members' behaviors and preferences with regard to electronic journals. The presentation also summarizes results from three other recent research projects investigating similar questions. The other three research efforts summarized are: (1) Tenopir and King, 2002, Reading behaviour and electronic journals. Learned Publishing. 15(4):259-266. Reports on reading behavior of natural and social scientists at the University of Tennessee and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Information on frequency of article readings, sources of article readings, and methods used to identify articles read. (2) Brockman et al., 2001, Scholarly work in the humanities and the evolving information environment. . Digital Library Federation and Council on Library and Information Resources. Available at http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub104/pub104.pdf and (3) Friedlander, 2002, Dimensions and Use of the Scholarly Information Environment. Digital Library Federation. Available at http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub110/contents.htmItem Are Researchers Ready For The Electronic-Only Journal Collection?(portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2002-07) Dillon, Irma; Hahn, KarlaThis article discusses a web-based survey conducted by the University of Maryland Libraries in the spring of 2001. The survey was distributed among university faculty and graduate students to determine their views on and use of electronic journals. Staff at the Libraries hoped to discover information that would suggest how best to manage collections to serve the university community efficiently. The survey adds two new dimensions to previous studies of electronic journal usage. First, it examines the respondents' current use of print journals in library collections and second, distinguishes between respondents' format preferences for those journals that are most central to their research and teaching activities as well as less important titles.