UMD Theses and Dissertations
Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/3
New submissions to the thesis/dissertation collections are added automatically as they are received from the Graduate School. Currently, the Graduate School deposits all theses and dissertations from a given semester after the official graduation date. This means that there may be up to a 4 month delay in the appearance of a given thesis/dissertation in DRUM.
More information is available at Theses and Dissertations at University of Maryland Libraries.
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item INDIGENOUS INVOLVEMENT IN ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION: AN ANALYSIS OF VIRGINIA’S SOVEREIGN NATIONS INVOLVEMENT IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM(2023) Brooks, Nicole L; Shaffer, L. J.; Rose, Kenneth A.; Environmental Science and Technology; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)Indigenous involvement in conservation and restoration practices, specifically those funded by government entities (e.g., EPA, USGS, NOAA), is not well documented in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States. Increased Indigenous involvement in conservation and restoration projects globally, raises questions regarding this apparent environmental practice gap in the Eastern United States (McAlvay, 2021; Poto, 2021; Turner, 2010). Currently, government-led restoration projects in the Chesapeake Bay, led by the Chesapeake Bay Program, lack a strong Indigenous presence or contribution despite 7 federally-recognized Sovereign Nations in the surrounding watershed. To understand this gap, a literature review was first conducted to provide an initial context for viewing the contemporary Indigenous involvement in Chesapeake Bay restoration. The review was the basis for a detailed analysis of Virginia’s Sovereign Nation involvement in the Chesapeake Bay Program that used a series of interviews, participant observations, and a social network analysis. Interview participants were classified into one of three representative categories: Sovereign Nation, government organization, and non-government organization. Questions about working relationships between organizations were assessed to understand the political-ecological dynamics driving the interactions in the Chesapeake Bay restoration social network, specifically among the representative categories. Results showed a lack of a consistent and intentional relationship between the Sovereign Nations of Virginia and the Chesapeake Bay Program. According to the federal trust relationship, this infers that the lack of a strong Sovereign Nation involvement in the Chesapeake Bay Program may be contributing to a continued state of Environmental Injustice. To begin to address this low-level of involvement, the Chesapeake Bay Program should devote significant effort to building intentional relationships with the Sovereign Nations, including a more formal and official representation within the Chesapeake Bay Program.Item Ecological Restoration Drives Functional Composition and Diversity in Urban Forest Patches(2020) Do, Sara Miya; Johnson, Lea R; Plant Science and Landscape Architecture (PSLA); Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)Urbanization greatly alters environmental conditions, affecting biodiversity in cities and ecological processes. To restore processes and native biodiversity, land managers have turned to ecological restoration of urban forest patches. Urban forest patches, nested within urban ecosystems, are subject to urban influences during ecological succession. Building on a long-term study evaluating outcomes of ecological restoration in New York City, I examined the effects of urban conditions, restoration, and forest succession on functional composition and diversity of restored and unrestored urban forest patches after 15-20 years. Functional traits play an essential role in community assemblages and influence the resilience and ecosystem functioning of urban ecosystems. I found that restored plots had greater functional evenness. Differences in functional composition indicated direct influence from restoration, succession, urban conditions, and success in meeting restoration goals. These results demonstrate that ecological restoration drives changes in functional composition and diversity of urban forest patches.