Americans on Nuclear Weapons

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKull, Steven
dc.contributor.authorGallagher, Nancy
dc.contributor.authorFehsenfeld, Evan
dc.contributor.authorLewitus, Evan Charles
dc.contributor.authorRead, Emmaly
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-23T21:37:49Z
dc.date.available2020-04-23T21:37:49Z
dc.date.issued2019-05
dc.descriptionA policymaking simulation is an online process that puts citizens in the shoes of elected officials by simulating the process they go through in making policy decisions. Each simulation introduces a broader policy topic and then presents a series of modules that address a specific policy option that is currently under consideration in the current discourse. For each module, respondents: 1) receive a short briefing on a policy issue and the option or options for addressing it; 2) evaluate arguments for and against the policy options; and 3) finally, make their recommendation for what their elected officials should do.en_US
dc.description.abstractUS-Russian Arms Control Treaties: More than eight in ten favor the US continuing to have arms control treaties with Russia, with support among Republicans comparable to that of Democrats. Extending New START: Eight in ten favor the United States agreeing to extend the New START Treaty. Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty: Two thirds, including a majority of Republicans, oppose withdrawing from the INF Treaty and favor instead staying within the Treaty and redoubling efforts to work with the Russians to address concerns of both sides. Nuclear Weapons Testing: Overwhelming majorities from both parties approve of the US continuing its moratorium on nuclear testing, effectively abiding by the 1996 Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. In the event the US develops a technological innovation that might make it possible to build a new type of nuclear weapon that could destroy more of an adversary’s nuclear weapons, a majority still said they would oppose breaking the moratorium, though a bare majority of Republicans favored it. US NUCLEAR WEAPONS CAPABILITIES: Minimum Retaliatory Capability: Eight in ten or more from both parties support the US having a retaliatory nuclear capability destructive enough that no country could think that there would be any advantage in attacking the United States with nuclear weapons. Low Yield Warheads and the Need for Matching Nuclear Options Respondents were presented a rationale for developing nuclear capabilities over and above the minimum retaliatory capability based on the need to threaten to match any type of nuclear capability an adversary might use. When presented a specific example of the current debate over whether the US should put low-yield nuclear warheads on missiles on submarines to match corresponding Russian capabilities, a bipartisan majority of two-thirds supported adding a low-yield option to nuclear missiles on submarines. Yet, when asked about the general principle, a plurality endorsed the view that a minimum retaliatory capability is adequate, over the view that the US must have the capability to retaliate against a major attack using only a type of weapon similar to the type the adversary used. Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs): Knowing that the United States currently has strategic weapons on submarines, bombers, and land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles, six in ten, including a majority of Republicans, favor phasing out the ICBM force. However, only one-third favor unilaterally reducing the net number of strategic warheads in the U.S. arsenal instead of putting more warheads on submarines and bombers to keep the same total as the Russians. FIRST USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS: US Declaratory Policy on First Use: Only one in five endorsed the United States explicitly declaring that it would consider using nuclear weapons first and stating what kinds of non-nuclear attacks would prompt the United States to consider doing so. Just slightly more than one in five favored explicitly declaring that the United States will never use nuclear weapons first. A majority favored continuing the current policy of being ambiguous about whether and under what conditions the United States would consider using nuclear weapons first. Presented a list of possible types of attack, less than one in six favored declaring that the United States would consider using nuclear weapons in response to any of them. Limiting Presidential First Use: Two thirds, including six in ten Republicans, support Congressional legislation requiring that to use nuclear weapons first, the President would first have to consult Congress and it would have to issue a declaration of war on the country to be attacked with nuclear weapons.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL & SECURITY STUDIESen_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/xmwh-pppk
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/25845
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtProgram for Public Consultation (PPC)
dc.relation.isAvailableAtDigital Repository at the University of Maryland
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md)
dc.subjectNew START (Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty)en_US
dc.subjectNuclear proliferationen_US
dc.subjectINF Treatyen_US
dc.subjectCBTBen_US
dc.subjectICBMsen_US
dc.subjectFirst Useen_US
dc.subjectLow Yield nuclear warheadsen_US
dc.subjectMinimum retaliatory capabilityen_US
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_US
dc.subjectRussiaen_US
dc.titleAmericans on Nuclear Weaponsen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Nuclear_Weapons_Report_0519.pdf
Size:
3.51 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Final report
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Nuclear Weapons -- May 2019 -- final public.sav
Size:
362.87 KB
Format:
Unknown data format
Description:
SPSS Dataset
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Nuclear_-Weapons_Quesionnaire_0519.pdf
Size:
784.52 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Questionnaire toplines
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
PR -- Large Bipartisan Majorities Favor Prohibiting President from Using Nuclear Weapons First Without Congressional Approval.docx
Size:
15.79 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word 2007
Description:
Press release
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Program for Public Consultation (PPC)