On Merging Command Selection and Direct Manipulation

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorGuimbretiere, Francoisen_US
dc.date.accessioned2004-05-31T23:22:22Z
dc.date.available2004-05-31T23:22:22Z
dc.date.created2002-09en_US
dc.date.issued2003-01-21en_US
dc.description.abstractWe present the results of a study comparing the relative benefits of three command selection techniques that merge command selection and direct manipulation: one two-handed technique , Toolglass, and two one-handed techniques , control menus and FlowMenu. Our results show that control menus and FlowMenu are significantly faster than Toolglass. Further analysis suggests that merging command selection and direct manipulation is the key factor in the performance of all three techniques. Keywords: FlowMenu, control menus, tool palette, Toolglass, empirical studies (UMIACS-TR-2002-91) (HCIL-TR-2002-20)en_US
dc.format.extent561638 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/1235
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtTech Reports in Computer Science and Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUMIACS Technical Reportsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUM Computer Science Department; CS-TR-4411en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesUMIACS; UMIACS-TR-2002-91en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesHCIL-TR-2002-20en_US
dc.titleOn Merging Command Selection and Direct Manipulationen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
CS-TR-4411.pdf
Size:
548.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Technical Reports from UMIACS
Technical Reports of the Computer Science Department