Assessing the Iran Deal

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKull, Steven
dc.contributor.authorRamsay, Clay
dc.contributor.authorLewis (aka Fehsenfeld), Evan
dc.contributor.authorGallagher, Nancy
dc.contributor.authorPierce, Eric
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-29T20:39:28Z
dc.date.available2020-04-29T20:39:28Z
dc.date.issued2015-09
dc.descriptionA policymaking simulation is an online process that puts citizens in the shoes of elected officials by simulating the process they go through in making policy decisions. Each simulation introduces a broader policy topic and then presents a series of modules that address a specific policy option that is currently under consideration in the current discourse. For each module, respondents: 1) receive a short briefing on a policy issue and the option or options for addressing it; 2) evaluate arguments for and against the policy options; and 3) finally, make their recommendation for what their elected officials should do.en_US
dc.description.abstractA majority of a national citizen advisory panel, made up of a representative sample of American registered voters, recommends Congress approve the deal recently negotiated between Iran, the United States and other permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (plus Germany) on Iran’s nuclear program. After assessing strong critiques of the terms of the deal – including rebuttals – and then evaluating the pros and cons of alternatives, 55 percent concluded that Congress should approve the agreement, despite serious concerns about some of its details. Twenty-three percent recommended ratcheting up sanctions instead, 14 percent favored renewing negotiations to get better terms, and 7 percent recommended threatening Iran with military strikes unless they agree to better terms.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipCenter for International Security Studies, School of Public Policyen_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/gfeu-aruc
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/25932
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtProgram for Public Consultation (PPC)
dc.relation.isAvailableAtDigital Repository at the University of Maryland
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md)
dc.subjectIranen_US
dc.subjectNuclear energyen_US
dc.subjectJoint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)en_US
dc.titleAssessing the Iran Dealen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 4 of 4
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Assessing_the_Iran_Deal_Report.pdf
Size:
5.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Report
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Iran Nuclear Deal -- public -- Aug 2015.sav
Size:
191.49 KB
Format:
Unknown data format
Description:
SPSS dataset
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
After Weighing Options, Majority Approves Iran Nuclear Deal.docx
Size:
15.32 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word 2007
Description:
Press release
Download
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Assessing_the_Iran_Deal_Quaire.pdf
Size:
271.7 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Questionnaire toplines
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.57 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Program for Public Consultation (PPC)