Assessing the Iran Deal
dc.contributor.author | Kull, Steven | |
dc.contributor.author | Ramsay, Clay | |
dc.contributor.author | Lewis (aka Fehsenfeld), Evan | |
dc.contributor.author | Gallagher, Nancy | |
dc.contributor.author | Pierce, Eric | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-04-29T20:39:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-04-29T20:39:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-09 | |
dc.description | A policymaking simulation is an online process that puts citizens in the shoes of elected officials by simulating the process they go through in making policy decisions. Each simulation introduces a broader policy topic and then presents a series of modules that address a specific policy option that is currently under consideration in the current discourse. For each module, respondents: 1) receive a short briefing on a policy issue and the option or options for addressing it; 2) evaluate arguments for and against the policy options; and 3) finally, make their recommendation for what their elected officials should do. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | A majority of a national citizen advisory panel, made up of a representative sample of American registered voters, recommends Congress approve the deal recently negotiated between Iran, the United States and other permanent members of the United Nations Security Council (plus Germany) on Iran’s nuclear program. After assessing strong critiques of the terms of the deal – including rebuttals – and then evaluating the pros and cons of alternatives, 55 percent concluded that Congress should approve the agreement, despite serious concerns about some of its details. Twenty-three percent recommended ratcheting up sanctions instead, 14 percent favored renewing negotiations to get better terms, and 7 percent recommended threatening Iran with military strikes unless they agree to better terms. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Center for International Security Studies, School of Public Policy | en_US |
dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.13016/gfeu-aruc | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1903/25932 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.isAvailableAt | Program for Public Consultation (PPC) | |
dc.relation.isAvailableAt | Digital Repository at the University of Maryland | |
dc.relation.isAvailableAt | University of Maryland (College Park, Md) | |
dc.subject | Iran | en_US |
dc.subject | Nuclear energy | en_US |
dc.subject | Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) | en_US |
dc.title | Assessing the Iran Deal | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 4 of 4
Loading...
- Name:
- Assessing_the_Iran_Deal_Report.pdf
- Size:
- 5.07 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Report
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- Iran Nuclear Deal -- public -- Aug 2015.sav
- Size:
- 191.49 KB
- Format:
- Unknown data format
- Description:
- SPSS dataset
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- After Weighing Options, Majority Approves Iran Nuclear Deal.docx
- Size:
- 15.32 KB
- Format:
- Microsoft Word 2007
- Description:
- Press release
Loading...
- Name:
- Assessing_the_Iran_Deal_Quaire.pdf
- Size:
- 271.7 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description:
- Questionnaire toplines