Twenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Outside the community
dc.contributor.author | Edgar, Harold | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-08-14T15:01:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-08-14T15:01:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1992 | |
dc.description.abstract | Twenty years ago, when the Washington Star told the public that the United States Public Health Service had, since 1932, maintained a study of untreated syphilis in the Negro male that was still going on, my reaction was, How could people have done this? I later worked on the participants' lawsuit, and I learned of the study's many complexities. In the end, though, the best explanation of "how" it could have happened is the obvious one: the researchers did not see the participants as part of "their" community or, indeed, as people whose lives could or would be much affected by what the researchers did. | |
dc.description.uri | https://www.questia.com/hbr-welcome | |
dc.identifier | https://doi.org/10.13016/zm2d-wtcg | |
dc.identifier.citation | Edgar, Harold (1992) Twenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Outside the community. The Hastings Center Report, 22 (6). pp. 32-35. | |
dc.identifier.other | Eprint ID 1091 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1903/23025 | |
dc.subject | Bioethics | |
dc.subject | Public Health | |
dc.subject | Research | |
dc.subject | Tuskegee Syphilis Study | |
dc.subject | untreated syphilis in the Negro male | |
dc.subject | community | |
dc.title | Twenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Outside the community | |
dc.type | Article |