Twenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Outside the community

dc.contributor.authorEdgar, Harold
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-14T15:01:34Z
dc.date.available2019-08-14T15:01:34Z
dc.date.issued1992
dc.description.abstractTwenty years ago, when the Washington Star told the public that the United States Public Health Service had, since 1932, maintained a study of untreated syphilis in the Negro male that was still going on, my reaction was, How could people have done this? I later worked on the participants' lawsuit, and I learned of the study's many complexities. In the end, though, the best explanation of "how" it could have happened is the obvious one: the researchers did not see the participants as part of "their" community or, indeed, as people whose lives could or would be much affected by what the researchers did.
dc.description.urihttps://www.questia.com/hbr-welcome
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/zm2d-wtcg
dc.identifier.citationEdgar, Harold (1992) Twenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Outside the community. The Hastings Center Report, 22 (6). pp. 32-35.
dc.identifier.otherEprint ID 1091
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/23025
dc.subjectBioethics
dc.subjectPublic Health
dc.subjectResearch
dc.subjectTuskegee Syphilis Study
dc.subjectuntreated syphilis in the Negro male
dc.subjectcommunity
dc.titleTwenty years after. The legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Outside the community
dc.typeArticle

Files