Impact of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ 4-Day Grace Period in a Low-Income Community

dc.contributor.authorIrigoyen, Matilde
dc.contributor.authorLaRussa, Philip
dc.contributor.authorFindley, Sally E
dc.contributor.authorChen, Shaofu
dc.contributor.authorCaesar, Arturo
dc.contributor.authorTesler, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-14T14:59:33Z
dc.date.available2019-08-14T14:59:33Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.description.abstractBackground: In 2002, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended vaccine doses administered </=4 days before the minimum age or interval be counted as valid. The study objective was to assess the impact of the 4-day grace period on the need for revaccination and associated costs in a low-income community, compared to standard practice (i.e., repeating all doses that fall outside current ACIP guidelines). Methods: From 1999 to 2001, semi-annual immunization assessments of 8293 randomly selected children, aged 19–35 months, were conducted at a 16-practice network serving an underserved community in New York City. Outcome measures were rates of antigen-specific invalid doses and number of children needing revaccination, with and without the 4-day grace period. Revaccination costs were based on the Vaccines for Children (VFC) price list. Results: The 4-day grace period reduced the number of children needing revaccination from 17.1% to 12.0%, a drop of 30%. The rates of invalid doses decreased from 1.9% to 1.3%, a drop of 33%. Invalid doses for hepatitis B (HepB)-2 decreased by two thirds (69.7%); for diphtheria–tetanus–acellular pertussis (DTaP)-1, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)-1 and Hib-3 by half (44.9%–50.0%); for Polio-1, Polio-2, Polio-3, and measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) by one third (31.6%–33.3%); and for DTaP-2, DTaP-3, HepB-3, and varicella by nearly one quarter (20.0%–24.0%). At these rates, revaccinating 100,000 children younger than age 3 years would cost $213,588 per year, compared to $152,539 with the 4-day grace period, in vaccine costs alone. Conclusions: In a low-income community, ACIP’s 4-day grace period made a significant impact on the number of children requiring revaccination and on revaccination costs. However, the number of children needing revaccination remains high.
dc.description.urihttps://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(03)00194-6/abstract
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/sqve-mo5q
dc.identifier.citationIrigoyen, Matilde and LaRussa, Philip and Findley, Sally E and Chen, Shaofu and Caesar, Arturo and Tesler, Peter (2003) Impact of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ 4-Day Grace Period in a Low-Income Community. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 25 (3). pp. 245-250.
dc.identifier.otherEprint ID 512
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/22599
dc.subjectPharmacotherapy
dc.subjectPractice
dc.subjectinterventions
dc.subjectResearch
dc.subjectadvisory committee
dc.subjectimmunization
dc.subjectlow-income community
dc.subjectAdvisory Committee on Immunization Practices
dc.subjectACIP
dc.titleImpact of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices’ 4-Day Grace Period in a Low-Income Community
dc.typeArticle

Files