Nutrient Retention in Restored Streams and Rivers: A Global Review and Synthesis

dc.contributor.authorNewcomer Johnson, Tamara A.
dc.contributor.authorKaushal, Sujay S.
dc.contributor.authorMayer, Paul M.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Rose M.
dc.contributor.authorSivirichi, Gwen M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-09T20:35:41Z
dc.date.available2024-01-09T20:35:41Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-25
dc.description.abstractExcess nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) from human activities have contributed to degradation of coastal waters globally. A growing body of work suggests that hydrologically restoring streams and rivers in agricultural and urban watersheds has potential to increase N and P retention, but rates and mechanisms have not yet been analyzed and compared across studies. We conducted a review of nutrient retention within hydrologically reconnected streams and rivers, including 79 studies. We developed a typology characterizing different forms of stream and river restoration, and we also analyzed nutrient retention across this typology. The studies we reviewed used a variety of methods to analyze nutrient cycling. We performed a further intensive meta-analysis on nutrient spiraling studies because this method was the most consistent and comparable between studies. A meta-analysis of 240 experimental additions of ammonium (NH4+), nitrate (NO3−), and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) was synthesized from 15 nutrient spiraling studies. Our results showed statistically significant relationships between nutrient uptake in restored streams and specific watershed attributes. Nitrate uptake metrics were significantly related to watershed surface area, impervious surface cover, and average reach width (p < 0.05). Ammonium uptake metrics were significantly related to discharge, velocity, and transient storage (p < 0.05). SRP uptake metrics were significantly related to watershed area, discharge, SRP concentrations, and chl a concentrations (p < 0.05). Given that most studies were conducted during baseflow, more research is necessary to characterize nutrient uptake during high flow. Furthermore, long-term studies are needed to understand changes in nutrient dynamics as projects evolve over time. Overall analysis suggests the size of the stream restoration (surface area), hydrologic connectivity, and hydrologic residence time are key drivers influencing nutrient retention at broader watershed scales and along the urban watershed continuum.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/w8040116
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/dspace/hevg-xx80
dc.identifier.citationNewcomer Johnson, T.A.; Kaushal, S.S.; Mayer, P.M.; Smith, R.M.; Sivirichi, G.M. Nutrient Retention in Restored Streams and Rivers: A Global Review and Synthesis. Water 2016, 8, 116.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/31557
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.isAvailableAtCollege of Computer, Mathematical & Natural Sciencesen_us
dc.relation.isAvailableAtGeologyen_us
dc.relation.isAvailableAtDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_us
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland (College Park, MD)en_us
dc.subjectstream restoration
dc.subjectfloodplain
dc.subjectgreen infrastructure
dc.subjectnutrient spiraling
dc.subjectnutrient retention
dc.subjectnitrogen
dc.subjectphosphorus
dc.subjectdenitrification
dc.subjectburied stream
dc.subjectsustainability
dc.subjecturban evolution
dc.titleNutrient Retention in Restored Streams and Rivers: A Global Review and Synthesis
dc.typeArticle
local.equitableAccessSubmissionNo

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
water-08-00116-v2.pdf
Size:
2.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format