Skip to content
University of Maryland LibrariesDigital Repository at the University of Maryland
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DRUM
    • College of Computer, Mathematical & Natural Sciences
    • Computer Science
    • Technical Reports from UMIACS
    • View Item
    •   DRUM
    • College of Computer, Mathematical & Natural Sciences
    • Computer Science
    • Technical Reports from UMIACS
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Understanding the Sources of Variation in Software Inspections

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    CS-TR-3762.ps (566.4Kb)
    No. of downloads: 370

    Auto-generated copy of CS-TR-3762.ps (376.5Kb)
    No. of downloads: 801

    Date
    1998-10-15
    Author
    Porter, Adam A.
    Siy, Harvey
    Mockus, Audris
    Votta, Lawrence G.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    In a previous experiment, we determined how various changes in three structural elements of the software inspection process (team size, and number and sequencing of session), altered effectiveness and interval. our results showed that such changes did not significantly influence the defect detection reate, but that certain combinations of changes dramatically increased the inspection interval. We also observed a large amount of unexplained variance in the data, indicating that other factors much be affecting inspection performance. The nature and extent of these other factos now have to be determined to ensure that they had not biased our earlier results. Also, identifying these other factors might suggest additional ways to improve the efficiency of inspection. Acting on the hypothesis that the "inputs" into the inspection process (reviewers, authors, and code units) were significant sources of variation, we modeled their effects on inspection performance. We found that they were responsible for much more variation in defect detection than was process structure. This leads us to conclude that better defect detection techniques, not better process structures, at the key to improving inspection effectiveness. The combined effects of process inputs and process structure on the inspection interval accounted for only a small percentage of the variance in inspection interval. Therefore, there still remain other factors which need to be identified. (Also cross-referenced as UMIACS-TR-97-22)
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1903/887
    Collections
    • Technical Reports from UMIACS
    • Technical Reports of the Computer Science Department

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DRUMCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister
    Pages
    About DRUMAbout Download Statistics

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility