The Role of the ISO in U.S. Electricity Markets: A Review of Restructuring in California and PJM

View/ Open
Date
1999-04Author
Cameron, Lisa
Cramton, Peter
Citation
"The Role of the ISO in U.S. Electricity Markets: A Review of Restructuring in California and PJM," (with Lisa Cameron) Electricity Journal, 71-81, April 1999.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Several regions of the U.S. have sought to restructure the electric power industry by separating the potentially
competitive generation sector from the natural monopoly functions of electricity transmission and distribution. Under this
restructuring scheme, a central authority, which we will refer to as the independent system operator (ISO), is given control
over both the transmission system and the spot market for electricity. The ISO’s role in managing the spot market is
relatively uncontroversial. This is because the spot market takes place in real time and requires continuous physical
adjustments to electricity supply and demand subject to complex constraints, such as the need to maintain voltage and
frequency within tight bands.
Although the ISO’s role in managing the spot market is generally accepted, its role in scheduling and pricing
generators prior to actual dispatch was hotly debated during the development of California’s market and remains a
contentious issue.1 Like other restructured electricity markets, the California market requires generators to be scheduled
for operation on a day-ahead basis and allows for adjustments in these day-ahead schedules up to an hour ahead of actual
dispatch. However, the California ISO has a minimal role in this scheduling process; almost all scheduling is carried out
by a number of competing scheduling coordinators, referred to as SCs. In contrast, the ISO in the Pennsylvania New
Jersey Maryland market (PJM) schedules all generators that do not elect to schedule themselves. This paper discusses the
California and PJM approaches to shed light on the controversy over the ISO’s role in pre-dispatch phases of the market.
Section I describes the California market while Section II briefly reviews PJM. Section III outlines the costs and benefits
associated with limiting the ISO’s role in the scheduling phases of the market. Section IV summarizes recent experience
in California and PJM and offers conclusions.