Show simple item record

Six-in-Ten Voters Favor Carbon Fee and Rebate Plan

dc.contributor.authorKull, Steven
dc.contributor.authorFehsenfeld, Evan
dc.contributor.authorLewitus, Evan "Charles"
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-22T19:52:42Z
dc.date.available2021-07-22T19:52:42Z
dc.date.issued2021-03
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/emu7-vd1v
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/27571
dc.descriptionA policymaking simulation is an online process that puts citizens in the shoes of elected officials by simulating the process they go through in making policy decisions. Each simulation introduces a broader policy topic and then presents a series of modules that address a specific policy option that is currently under consideration in the current discourse. For each module, respondents: 1) receive a short briefing on a policy issue and the option or options for addressing it; 2) evaluate arguments for and against the policy options; and 3) finally, make their recommendation for what their elected officials should do.en_US
dc.description.abstractBipartisan Majority Rejects Suspending Regulations on Emissions as Part of Plan – A new in-depth national survey finds that 62% of registered voters favor one of the few proposals for curbing greenhouse gas emissions that has support from both Republican and Democratic leaders — the carbon fee and rebate. This proposal would charge a fee on energy companies per ton of emissions (to encourage transitions to alternative energy sources), with a substantial portion of the costs presumably passed on to consumers in the form of higher energy costs (to encourage efficiency). To offset the higher energy costs, the revenue from the fee would be returned as a rebate to consumers on an equal basis. For low to middle income consumers the rebate would more than offset the higher energy costs. This proposal has been promoted by former Republican officials James Baker and the recent George Schultz as part of the Climate Leadership Council and was endorsed in a recent letter signed by over 3,500 economists, including dozens of Nobel Laureate winners, former Chairs of the Council of Economic Advisers, and former Chairs of the Federal Reserve Board, including both Republicans and Democrats. Variations of the proposal appear in several pieces of Congressional legislation including H.R. 763, S. 2284, H.R. 4051, S. 1128, S. 4484 and H.R. 4142 from the 116th Congress.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectCarbon fee and rebateen_US
dc.subjectClimate changeen_US
dc.subjectAir qualityen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmenten_US
dc.subjectGreenhouse gasesen_US
dc.subjectRegulationsen_US
dc.subject116th Congressen_US
dc.subjectEnergy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act of 2019, H.R. 763en_US
dc.subjectClimate Action Rebate Act of 2019, S. 2284en_US
dc.subjectClimate Action Rebate Act of 2019, H.R. 4051en_US
dc.subjectAmerican Opportunity Carbon Fee Act of 2019, S. 1128en_US
dc.subjectAmerica's Clean Future Fund Act, S. 4484en_US
dc.subjectAmerica Wins Act, H.R. 4142en_US
dc.subjectCarbon taxen_US
dc.titleSix-in-Ten Voters Favor Carbon Fee and Rebate Planen_US
dc.title.alternativeDataset enclosed includes data from: Two-in-Three Voters Favor Creating National Green Banken_US
dc.title.alternativeDataset enclosed includes data from: Bipartisan Majorities Favor Tax Incentives For Clean Energy and Efficiencyen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtProgram for Public Consultation (PPC)
dc.relation.isAvailableAtDigital Repository at the University of Maryland
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md)


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record