Entomology

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/11813

Browse

Author: search.filters.author.Kulhanek, Kelly

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparative Efficacy of Common Active Ingredients in Organic Insecticides Against Difficult to Control Insect Pests
    (MDPI, 2020-09-08) Dively, Galen P.; Patton, Terrence; Barranco, Lindsay; Kulhanek, Kelly
    There exists a lack of control efficacy information to enable decision-making about which organic insecticide product works best for a given insect pest. Here, we summarize results of 153 field trials on the control efficacy of common active ingredients in organic insecticides against 12 groups of the most difficult to control insect pests. These trials evaluated primarily the organic products Entrust (spinosad), Azera (pyrethrin and azadirachtin), PyGanic (pyrethrin) and Neemix (azadirachtin), which reduced pest infestations by an overall 73.9%, 61.7%, 48.6% and 46.1% respectively, averaged across all trials. Entrust was the most effective control option for many insect pests, particularly providing >75% control of flea beetles, Colorado potato beetle, cabbageworms and alfalfa weevil, but was relatively ineffective against true bugs and aphids. Azera provided >75% control of green peach aphid, flea beetles, Japanese beetle, Mexican bean beetle, potato leafhopper and cabbageworms. PyGanic was less effective than Entrust and Azera but still provided >75% control of green peach aphid, flea beetles and potato leafhopper. The growth inhibition effects of azadirachtin in Neemix were particularly effective against larvae of Mexican bean beetle and Colorado potato beetle but was generally less effective in trials with insect infestations consisting mainly of adult stages. Those insect pests that were particularly difficult to control included thrips, stinkbugs, cucumber beetles and fruitworms. Several caveats pertaining to the application of the results are discussed.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Characterizing effectiveness of and obstacles to best beekeeping management practices
    (2020) Kulhanek, Kelly; vanEngelsdorp, Dennis; Entomology; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)
    Honey bees (Apis mellifera, L.) provide critical pollination services to many US crops, but decades of high colony loss rates have strained beekeepers’ ability to provide sufficient colonies for crop production. In a national survey of colony losses for the 2015-2016 season, beekeepers reported losses averaging at 37.4%, and that the parasitic mite Varroa destructor was a leading cause of mortality. Survey results were used to create empirical best management practices (BMPs) to reduce colony loss rates. Best practices were the top four practices which correlated to significant reductions in winter colony loss. This set of BMPs was tested on 140 colonies in 7 locations across the US, compared to average beekeeping practices. At the end of 3 years, apiaries managed according to BMPs exhibited reduced Varroa loads, which resulted in reduced fall viral loads and reduced winter mortality. However, colony loss rates still exceeded rates that beekeepers have deemed acceptable. A prominent factor affecting colony health and mortality in the BMP study was Varroa. After identifying Varroa treatment as a preventative measure, the effects of Varroa management were evaluated in non-experimental apiaries. Citizen scientist beekeepers participating in the Sentinel Apiary Program provided Varroa samples and Varroa management information. Out of 192 Varroa treatments applied to 155 apiaries over 2 years, only 45 treatments resulted in reduced Varroa loads. Common hypotheses of factors affecting Varroa population growth failed to explain the rapid increases in Varroa loads experienced by beekeepers in critical fall months. Finally, a more novel explanation for rapid increases in Varroa load was explored: horizontal transmission of mites between apiaries. Colonies that were visited by non-natal bees experienced larger increases in Varroa loads than unvisited colonies, but not as a result of visitation to or from high mite colonies. High mite colonies in the landscape represent a threat to nearby colonies, and cooperative Varroa management is likely to mediate colony losses resulting from Varroa. This dissertation supports the critical need for proactive, cooperative Varroa management to improve colony health and reduce mortality.