Behavioral & Community Health
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/2271
Prior to January 24, 2011, this unit was named the Department of Public & Community Health.
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Exploring Young Bi+ Women's Intersecting Mental Health and Sexual and Reproductive Health Experiences in Context: A Multi-Analytic Method Qualitative Study(2023) Robinson, Jennifer Lynn; Aparicio, Elizabeth M; Butler, James; Public and Community Health; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)Young bi+ women report worse mental health and sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes compared to gay, lesbian, and straight young adults. They experience intersecting threats to their health and well-being due to their sexuality, gender, and stage of development. There is a lack of research on bi+ women’s unique mental health and SRH experiences, and often bi+ women are overlooked due to bi-erasure and biphobia. Regressive policies related to LGBTQ+ and women’s rights, including increased restrictions to reproductive healthcare after the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision overturning abortion protections, further threaten bisexual women’s health. This dissertation used a multi-analytic method qualitative approach to explore the intersecting mental health and SRH experiences of young bisexual women in the current socio-political context. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted over Zoom with 16 young bi+ women from across the U.S. A narrative inquiry approach was used to explore young bi+ women’s mental health experiences and coping strategies. In addition, thematic analysis was used to investigate how young bi+ women describe their mental health as intersecting with their SRH in the current socio-political context. The study yielded rich and nuanced information about challenges these young bi+ women experienced throughout their lives that affected their mental health and SRH. Experiencing trauma had far-reaching negative effects on their mental health. Participants discussed the challenges of forming their identity within the social context, particularly as bi+ women in a society that often invalidates bisexual identities and subjugates women. They also discussed the joys along with difficulties of navigating young adulthood. They further described coping with challenges in a variety of adaptive (e.g., therapy, exercise) and maladaptive (e.g., substance use, self-injury) ways. They discussed relying on social support such as partners, friends, family, therapists, and teachers. Participants desired more support with sexuality-related issues, particularly in early adolescence. These bi+ women described their mental health and SRH as intertwined and discussed how bodily autonomy and agency were essential to their well-being. The socio-political context, including social norms, rhetoric, and federal- and state-level policies, influenced participants’ well-being. The current study shows that young bi+ women face unique threats to their mental health and SRH. Practice implications include improving access to affordable and LGBTQ+-affirming healthcare and developing interventions attuned to the needs of young bi+ women. Policies are needed that uphold the choice and agency of young women in their reproductive health decision-making. Future research should continue to explore the needs and experiences of young bi+ women concerning their mental health and SRH including demographic differences along with potential mechanisms resulting in poorer health.Item PREDICTORS OF RESILIENCE AMONG COMMISSIONED OFFICERS IN THE UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE(2012) Peat, Raquel Antonia; Desmond, Sharon M; Public and Community Health; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to examine the predictors of resilience and mental health among United States Public Health Service (USPHS) commissioned officers who have deployed. The study employed the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping (Antonovsky and Kats, 1967; Cohen, 1984; Lazarus and Cohen, 1977) to aid in evaluation of the above factors. Relatively few research studies have examined the concept of resilience, and to date, no study has systematically examined risk, social support, mental health and resilience in USPHS commissioned officers. A pilot study (N = 11) was conducted to determine acceptability of the survey items and assess time needed to complete the questionnaire. The final 94-item on-line survey was completed over a two month time period by a convenience sample of 534 USPHS commissioned officers. Univariate analyses demonstrated that when entered individually, team support, post-deployment social support and mental health (protective factors) and the covariates, gender and relationship status were significantly (p<0.05) associated with resilience, while predeployment affectivity (risk factor) was not. When all risk and protective factors were entered into the multivariate logistic regression model, team support, post-deployment social support, mental health, gender and being divorced as compared to being separated, widowed or living with a partner were found to be significantly associated with resilience (p<0.05). Also, both team support and resilience were negatively associated with mental illness measured using depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder subscales (p<0.05). Those USPHS commissioned officers who reported mental illness were less likely to be resilient. This study provides new data that may help improve our understanding of the resilience and mental health of USPHS commissioned officers, before and after deployment. Findings can be used to inform education and training programs for USPHS commissioned officers (e.g. coping skills training techniques) to help increase their ability to thrive despite adversity before and after deployment.