Theses and Dissertations from UMD

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/2

New submissions to the thesis/dissertation collections are added automatically as they are received from the Graduate School. Currently, the Graduate School deposits all theses and dissertations from a given semester after the official graduation date. This means that there may be up to a 4 month delay in the appearance of a give thesis/dissertation in DRUM

More information is available at Theses and Dissertations at University of Maryland Libraries.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    OPTIMIZATION AND EQUILIBRIUM MODELING FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY: FOCUS ON WASTEWATER-TO-ENERGY APPLICATIONS
    (2013) U-tapao, Chalida; Gabriel, Steven A; Civil Engineering; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)
    This dissertation presents three novel optimization models for sustainable wastewater management. The Blue Plains Advance Wastewater treatment plant (AWTP) operated by the District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority (DC Water) is used as a case study. The application to the Blue Plains AWTP is presented to illustrate the usefulness of the model and how wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), solid waste disposal plants, community management groups can actively and positively participate in energy and agricultural markets. Besides the conversion of the solid end products into biogas and electricity via digesters, WWTP can also produce Class B biosolids for land application or Class A biosolids for use as fertilizer. Chapter 1 introduces the Blue Plains case study and other important aspects of wastewater management. The first problem, discussed in Chapter 2, is a multi-objective, mixed-integer optimization model with an application to wastewater-derived energy. The decisions involve converting the amount of solid end products into biogas, and/or electricity for internal or external purposes. Three objectives; maximizing total value, minimizing energy purchased from external sources and minimizing carbon dioxide equivalent (CDE) emissions were presented via an approximation to the Pareto optimal set of solutions. The second type of problem is a stochastic multi-objective, mixed-integer optimization model with an application to wastewater-derived energy and is presented in Chapter 3. This model considers operational and investment decisions under uncertainty. We also consider investments in solar power and processing waste from outside sources for revenue and other benefits. The tradeoff decision between operational and investment costs and CDE emissions are presented. The third type of optimization model is a stochastic mathematical program with equilibrium constraints (MPEC) for sustainable wastewater management and is presented in Chapter 4. This two-level optimization problem is a stochastic model with a strategic WWTP as the upper-level player. The lower-level players represent the fertilizer, natural gas, compressed natural gas (CNG) and electricity markets. All the lower-level players are price-takers. Chapter 5 considers a comparison of the three optimization models discussed above and highlights differences. Chapter 6 provides conclusions, contributions, and potential future directions.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Using dredged material to restore the Chesapeake Marshlands Complex: Preliminary application of a risk-based optimization model for comparing placement options
    (2010) Shearin, Charlotte Bruce; King, Dr. Dennis M.; Marine-Estuarine-Environmental Sciences; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)
    Using dredged material to restore wetlands in the Chesapeake Marshlands Complex (CMC) could offer solutions to two separate problems: 1) restoring and protecting the marshes in the CMC; and 2) finding an innovative reuse for dredged material from the Chesapeake Bay approach channels. The risk-based optimization model presented here assesses and compares restoration options for two alternative years (2023 and 2036) when the project may begin and represents a preliminary screening of material placement locations. Restoration of Zones 2a (Barbados Island) and 2b (Confluence Area) appear to provide significant environmental benefits, suggesting that restoration at these locations would provide the best return on investment. Low marsh restoration also provides a significant amount of benefits accrued. Based on sensitivity analysis, it appears that the choice of when to begin the project also represents tradeoffs between onsite habitat benefits and recreational benefits. Model results should be interpreted cautiously, considering the model limitations.