Theses and Dissertations from UMD
Permanent URI for this communityhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/2
New submissions to the thesis/dissertation collections are added automatically as they are received from the Graduate School. Currently, the Graduate School deposits all theses and dissertations from a given semester after the official graduation date. This means that there may be up to a 4 month delay in the appearance of a give thesis/dissertation in DRUM
More information is available at Theses and Dissertations at University of Maryland Libraries.
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Determinants of Unintended Pregnancy and Modern Family Planning Use(2017) Kim, Theresa Youngjoo; Boudreaux, Michel H; Health Services Administration; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)Unintended pregnancy, defined as a pregnancy that is mistimed or unwanted, is one of the world’s most common negative health outcomes. Furthermore, the United Nations Population Fund has found that 225 million women wish to delay or avoid pregnancy yet do not engage in modern family planning method use. Unintended pregnancy affects both maternal health (by way of nutrient deficiency, reproductive organ deficiency, and mental health) and child health (low birth weight, reduced gestational age, and nursing difficulties). The most life-saving and cost-saving means to prevent unintended pregnancy is to encourage modern family planning use. This dissertation examines family planning and unintended pregnancy in three different national contexts. In these studies, I: 1. Decompose the differences in unintended pregnancy rates for black and Hispanic women compared to white women in the United States; 2. Examine the relationship among indicators of health literacy, health system access, and utilization of modern family planning in Senegal; 3. Evaluate an intervention in Benin designed to increase modern family planning use. My research found that black and Hispanic women had a greater likelihood of unintended pregnancy compared to white women. However, psychosocial and socioeconomic factors contributed to the greater likelihoods of unintended pregnancy among racial and ethnic minorities. Among indicators of health literacy, oral and visual messages were the strongest predictors of health system access and modern family planning use in Senegal. The conclusion of the intervention in Benin found that social diffusion behaviors increased among people in the treatment group, and furthermore, the intervention did reduce unmet need for modern family planning use. These research results, though from different research studies, can imply that increasing access as much as possible to modern family planning use can ultimately prevent unintended pregnancy.Item RACIAL AND ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN ACCESSING TIMELY CANCER SCREENING AND TREATMENT SERVICES: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS(2013) King, Christopher Jerome; Thomas, Stephen B.; Chen, Jie; Health Services Administration; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)This research is organized into three integrated studies that explored differences in screening and treatment services across the cancer care continuum by race and ethnicity. The Andersen Behavioral Model of Health Services Use and the Five Dimensions of Access were used as conceptual frameworks. In the first study (Chapter 2), data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey were used to examine breast and cervical cancer screening rates before and during the Great Recession (2007-2009). The interaction terms of recession and race and ethnicity were controlled to examine whether minorities exhibited different utilization patterns under economic shock compared to Whites. In Chapter 3, data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) from 2006-2010 were used to identify adult cancer survivors and adults without a history of cancer. Multivariate logistic regressions were applied to examine the prevalence of cost, organizational and transportation barriers between survivors and the general population. The likelihood of experiencing barriers was explored by race and ethnicity. In Chapter 4, differences in the likelihood of experiencing access barriers among survivors by race and ethnicity was explored. Data were merged from the 2000-2011 (NHIS) to identify adult cancer survivors who reported cost, organizational and transportation barriers. Logistic regressions were applied to determine the likelihood of reporting each type of barrier, while controlling for demographic and socioeconomic variables. The Fairlie decomposition technique was applied to identify contributing factors that explained differences in accessing care based by race and ethnicity. Overall, results of the investigations demonstrate that: (1) breast and cervical screening rates declined most among White women during the recession period, while rates increased among Hispanic women during the same period; (2) minority cancer survivors were significantly more likely to experience access-to-care barriers than Whites; and (3) insurance, comorbidity, perceived health and nativity were leading factors that contributed to racial and ethnic differences in timely receipt of cancer screening and treatment services. As provisions of the Affordable Care Act take effect, findings provide insight into practices, policies, and future research that will help achieve Healthy People 2020 screening objectives and reduce racial and ethnic disparities in accessing timely cancer care.