Theses and Dissertations from UMD

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/2

New submissions to the thesis/dissertation collections are added automatically as they are received from the Graduate School. Currently, the Graduate School deposits all theses and dissertations from a given semester after the official graduation date. This means that there may be up to a 4 month delay in the appearance of a give thesis/dissertation in DRUM

More information is available at Theses and Dissertations at University of Maryland Libraries.

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Natural Resources, Civil Conflict, and the Political Ecology of Scale
    (2018) Wayland, Joshua James; Geores, Martha; Geography; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)
    This dissertation adopts a multi-scalar and mixed methods approach to interrogate the widely observed but underdefined relationship between natural resources and civil conflict. The results of three largely independent analyses are presented, corresponding to three distinct but overlapping epistemological scales and applying analytical methods appropriate to each scale. Cross-country spatial econometric analysis concluded that interstate variation in the incidence of conflict events is explained, in part, by a resource curse mechanism, whereby economic dependence on petroleum rents undermines state capacity and democratic governance, making a state more vulnerable to conflict. The results of a subnational quantitative study of the New People’s Army insurgency in the Philippines suggest that the spatial distribution of conflict risk within countries affected by civil war can be shaped by the environmental and socioeconomic impacts of resource extraction. And, a case study of a conflict over magnetite mining in the northern Philippines found that controversial resource extraction projects can create opportunities for non-state actors to develop alliances with civilian networks, discursively rescale localized disputes over resource governance to align with broader patterns of civil violence, and propagate narrative frames justifying violent collective action. From these results, a political ecology of scale in resource-related conflicts is set forth, arguing that the scalar properties of conflict vulnerability, conflict risk, and conflict opportunity have both epistemological and ontological implications; in particular, it is proposed that extractive enclaves, by fostering overlapping and intersecting scalar configurations of economic, socio-cultural, governance, and biophysical processes, constitute ‘natural habitats’ for civil conflict in which various actors can renegotiate their relative scalar positions through discursive and violent means to achieve political objectives.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    HAVE THE LOCAL PEOPLE BECOME INVISIBLE? A CASE STUDY OF A MILITARY INSTALLATION ON JEJU ISLAND, SOUTH KOREA.
    (2018) Jo, Nayoung; Geores, Martha; Geography; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)
    This study examines the effects of the construction of a military base on local communities on Jeju Island, South Korea. The South Korean military's intent in building these facilities is to demonstrate military sovereignty to neighboring countries while also providing socio-economic benefits to the local population (Korean Navy, Ministry of National Defense of Korea). However, local communities and NGOs continue to resist contemporary military construction policies due to the ecological, social and economic impacts of this process, which are exacerbated by the government’s unilateral approach and its failure to implement a system where the surrounding localities can influence construction policies (Sze et al., 2009). While resistance to military facilities is widely documented, this research highlights the disconnect between the different political scales represented by the military and the local community, or those who are empowered and the average local citizen, whose voice has been marginalized. This study focuses on the local people’s experience through the theoretical frame of environmental justice, and the concepts of scale and political ecology while using phenomenology to analyze open-ended interview data. This research concluded that 1) the local people were made voiceless and invisible through marginalization by the government; 2) this case is an environmental injustice case by identifying how the current process marginalizes local communities and environmental impacts through the analytical frames of environmental justice and the concept of scale; and 3) the combination of environmental justice theory and the concept of scale from political ecology is a more effective application of this study and can contribute to future related studies.