Theses and Dissertations from UMD

Permanent URI for this communityhttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/2

New submissions to the thesis/dissertation collections are added automatically as they are received from the Graduate School. Currently, the Graduate School deposits all theses and dissertations from a given semester after the official graduation date. This means that there may be up to a 4 month delay in the appearance of a give thesis/dissertation in DRUM

More information is available at Theses and Dissertations at University of Maryland Libraries.

Browse

Filters

20191

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Mohtadi, MehrdadSubject: search.filters.subject.Adsorption

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    REMOVAL OF STORMWATER DISSOLVED ORGANIC NITROGEN MODEL COMPOUNDS THROUGH ADSORPTION AND BIOTRANSFORMATION
    (2019) Mohtadi, Mehrdad; Davis, Allen P.; Civil Engineering; Digital Repository at the University of Maryland; University of Maryland (College Park, Md.)
    Bioretention systems are stormwater control measures designed to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus transferred by stormwater to water resources. They are, however, not effectively designed to remove dissolved organic nitrogen (DON). This study concentrated on improvement of bioretention design to remove stormwater DON. Batch adsorption of eight organic nitrogenous compounds onto several adsorbents showed that coal activated carbon (AC) could be a reliable adsorbent for removal of organic nitrogenous compounds such as pyrrole and N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (NAG). The adsorption capacity of pyrrole and NAG on coal AC were 0.4 mg N/g (at equilibrium concentration, Ce = 0.02 mg N/L) and 0.71 mg N/g (at Ce = 1 mg N/L), respectively. These eight nitrogenous compounds were also tested for continuous column adsorption on a media mixture of coal AC + quartz sand, and only pyrrole showed an appreciable adsorption performance; the breakthrough and exhaustion depths for pyrrole were 88 and 499 m, respectively, at the fixed superficial velocity of 61 cm/h and influent DON concentration of 1 mg N/L. Pyrrole adsorption was also minimally affected by superficial velocity (DON removal efficiency stayed > 91% for all tested superficial velocities, 7 to 489 cm/h). Because the adsorption process was successful for removal of only one (pyrrole) out of eight examined compounds, biological treatment was also investigated for removal of organic nitrogenous compounds. Biotransformation alongside adsorption demonstrated benefits such as ammonification of bio-recalcitrant organic nitrogen compounds, e.g., pyrrole, and bioregeneration of the adsorbent (coal AC). According to the results, ammonifiction might be considered as a possible reliable mechanism for stormwater DON removal at low temperatures > 4°C. Under intermittent wetting/draining conditions, the effluent DON was less than 0.1 mg N/L after the applied depth of 48 m, indicating that DON was successfully removed through simultaneous adsorption/ammonification, although generated ammonium in the effluent must be properly addressed. Overall, based on the results from the current study, some DON types were strongly adsorbed by adsorbents, e.g., adsorption of pyrrole on coal AC, some were more bioavailable, e.g., ammonification of leucine, and some were barely adsorbable and bioavailable, e.g., Aldrich humic acid on coal AC. Accordingly, both adsorption and biotransformation should be considered to enhance stormwater DON removal as much as possible.