Mathematics Teachers' Interpretations of Messages in Curricular Resources and the Relations of These Interpretations to Their Beliefs and Practices

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorFey, James Ten_US
dc.contributor.advisorGraeber, Anna Oen_US
dc.contributor.authorGraybeal, Christy Dankoen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCurriculum and Instructionen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-10-11T05:44:00Z
dc.date.available2008-10-11T05:44:00Z
dc.date.issued2008-07-28en_US
dc.description.abstractThe curricular materials that teachers use, the assessments that teachers are required to administer, and the professional development activities in which teachers engage all contain messages about mathematics and mathematics teaching. The recent emphasis on both reform-oriented teaching and high-stakes testing in mathematics has increased the number and intensity of competing and conflicting messages. This qualitative study used survey, observation, and interview research methods to explore the messages that five experienced, elementary certified, middle school mathematics teachers interpreted from a variety of resources and the ways that those interpretations related to their beliefs and practices. The teachers in this study interpreted messages in eleven themes. Four themes--Concepts and Procedures, Question types, Source of solution methods, and Technology--created the most tension for the teachers. In general, when the teachers agreed with messages from professional resources about mathematics curriculum and teaching, they attempted to reflect those messages in their practice. However, the resources often lacked supports necessary for the teachers to follow through with the messages in their practice. When the teachers disagreed with particular messages they sometimes consciously decided to not reflect those messages in their practice. But usually the messages were so pervasive that the teachers were not able to ignore them. At times they felt obliged to reflect all of the messages in their practice, regardless of their personal beliefs. The amount of support that the resources provided for teachers was a strong indicator of the degree to which the teachers were successful in reflecting the messages in their practice. Frequently the resources only superficially presented messages to the teachers. This phenomenon was especially apparent when the messages were reform-oriented messages. The study suggests that curriculum and policy writers need to consider the consistency of their messages, be more specific about their intentions, and provide more support to teachers as they try to translate recommendations into practice. Additionally, teacher educators and providers of professional development need to help teachers learn to critically examine curricular resources so that they can more consciously make decisions about to which messages they will attend.en_US
dc.format.extent879763 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/8542
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEducation, Mathematicsen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEducation, Curriculum and Instructionen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledinterpretation of messagesen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledmathematics educationen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledcurricular resourcesen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledbeliefsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledteacher practicesen_US
dc.titleMathematics Teachers' Interpretations of Messages in Curricular Resources and the Relations of These Interpretations to Their Beliefs and Practicesen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
umi-umd-5625.pdf
Size:
859.14 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

UMD Theses and Dissertations
Teaching, Learning, Policy & Leadership Theses and Dissertations