dc.contributor.author	Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA)
dc.date.accessioned	2010-06-24T18:42:51Z
dc.date.available	2010-06-24T18:42:51Z
dc.date.issued	2001-02-02
dc.description.abstract	In 1995, the Program on International Policy Attitudes found that, while an overwhelming majority supported aid in principle, a majority wanted to cut it. However when asked to estimate how much of the budget was devoted to foreign aid, respondents vastly overestimated its size, and when asked what would be appropriate they proposed an amount far higher than the actual amount. In this 2001 study PIPA sought to find out how perceptions and attitudes about aid have evolved in the interim.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/1903/10188
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAt	Digital Repository at the University of Maryland
dc.relation.isAvailableAt	University of Maryland (College Park, Md)
dc.subject	Foreign aid	en_US
dc.subject	US	en_US
dc.title	Americans on Foreign Aid and World Hunger	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US

Americans on Foreign Aid and World Hunger

Files