Comparison of relative versus absolute pointing devices

dc.contributor.authorNorman, Kent
dc.contributor.authorNorman, Kirk
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-15T17:35:55Z
dc.date.available2010-11-15T17:35:55Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractIn this study, a relative pointing device was compared with two different absolute pointing devices. Participants used a Wii Remote™ controller with the Wii MotionPlus™ attachment in three different configurations of motion sensing: Relative (6-axis: 3-axis accelerometer and 3-axis gyroscope), Camera Absolute (camera only), and Stabilized Absolute (camera + 6-axis). Twenty-four participants were given a series of movement tasks based on Fitts’ test to complete at three different distances. In terms of information throughput, pointing accuracy, and user preference, relative pointing was clearly superior to absolute pointing, even when absolute pointing included stabilization.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/10983
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtInstitute for Systems Researchen_us
dc.relation.isAvailableAtDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_us
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland (College Park, MD)en_us
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTR_2010-19;
dc.subjectpointing devicesen_US
dc.subjectWii Remoteen_US
dc.subjectWii MotionPlusen_US
dc.subjectcomparisonen_US
dc.titleComparison of relative versus absolute pointing devicesen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
LAPDP2010TR04_edited.pdf
Size:
1.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.8 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: