|
DRUM >
College of Behavioral & Social Sciences >
Hearing & Speech Sciences >
Hearing & Speech Sciences Research Works >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1903/7478
|
| Title: | Fluency of School-Aged Children With a History of Specific Expressive Language Impairment: An Exploratory Study |
| Authors: | Boscolo, Brian Ratner, Nan Bernstein Rescorla, Leslie |
| Type: | Article |
| Keywords: | fluency stuttering language expressive language impairment specific language impairment (SLI) |
| Issue Date: | Feb-2002 |
| Publisher: | American Speech-Language-Hearing Association |
| Citation: | Boscolo, B., Bernstein Ratner, N. & Rescorla, L. (2002). Fluency characteristics of children with a history of Specific Expressive Language Impairment (SLI-E). American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 41-49. |
| Abstract: | A large volume of literature now links
language demand and fluency behaviors in
children. Although it might be reasonable to
assume that children with relatively weak
language skills might demonstrate higher levels
of disfluency, the sparse literature on this topic
is characterized by conflicting findings on the
relationship between language impairment and
disfluency. However, in studies finding elevated
disfluency in children with specific language
impairment, a higher frequency of disfluencies
more characteristic of stuttering has been
noted. This study asks whether children with
long-standing histories of language delay and
impairment are more disfluent, and display
different types of disfluencies than their
typically developing, age-matched peers. Elicited narratives from 22 pairs of 9-year-old
children were analyzed for fluency characteristics.
Half of the children had histories of specific
expressive language impairment (HSLI-E),
whereas the others had typical developmental
histories. The children with HSLI-E were
significantly more disfluent than their peers and
produced more stutter-like disfluencies,
although these behaviors were relatively
infrequent in both groups. Implications for
clinical intervention and future research are
discussed. |
| URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1903/7478 |
| Appears in Collections: | Hearing & Speech Sciences Research Works
|
All items in DRUM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|