Ye, ZhenyaoMo, ChenLiu, SongGao, SiFeng, LiZhao, BoaoCanida, TravisWu, Yu-ChiaHatch, Kathryn S.Ma, YizhouMitchell, Braxton D.Hong, Elliot L.Kochunov, PeterChen, ChixiangZhao, BingxinChen, ShuoMa, TianzhouElevated arterial blood pressure (BP) is a common risk factor for cerebrovascular and cardiovascular diseases, but no causal relationship has been established between BP and cerebral white matter (WM) integrity. In this study, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis with individual-level data by defining two nonoverlapping sets of European ancestry individuals (genetics–exposure set: N = 203,111; mean age = 56.71 years, genetics–outcome set: N = 16,156; mean age = 54.61 years) from UK Biobank to evaluate the causal effects of BP on regional WM integrity, measured by fractional anisotropy of diffusion tensor imaging. Two BP traits: systolic and diastolic blood pressure were used as exposures. Genetic variant was carefully selected as instrumental variable (IV) under the MR analysis assumptions. We existing large-scale genome-wide association study summary data for validation. The main method used was a generalized version of inverse-variance weight method while other MR methods were also applied for consistent findings. Two additional MR analyses were performed to exclude the possibility of reverse causality. We found significantly negative causal effects (FDR-adjusted p < .05; every 10 mmHg increase in BP leads to a decrease in FA value by .4% ~ 2%) of BP traits on a union set of 17 WM tracts, including brain regions related to cognitive function and memory. Our study extended the previous findings of association to causation for regional WM integrity, providing insights into the pathological processes of elevated BP that might chronically alter the brain microstructure in different regions.en-USblood pressurediffusion tensor imaginggenome-wide association studyMendelian randomizationwhite matterDeciphering the causal relationship between blood pressure and regional white matter integrity: A two-sample Mendelian randomization studyArticle