Leone, NicolaScarcello, FrancescoSubrahmanian, V. S.Almost all semantics for logic programs with negation identify a set, SEM(P), of models of program P, as the intended semantics of P, and any model M in this class is considered a possible meaning of P w.r.t. the semantics the user has in mind. Thus, for example, in the case of stable models, choice models, answer sets, etc., different possible models correspond to different ways of ``completing'' the incomplete information in the logic program. However, different end-users may have different ideas on which of these different models in SEM(P) is a reasonable one from their point of view. For instance, given SEM(P), user U1 may prefer model M1 to model M2 based on some evaluation criterion that she has. In this paper, we will develop a notion of logic program semantics based on the concept of an Optimal Model. This semantics doesn't add yet another semantics to thelogic programming arena -- rather, it takes as input, an existing semantics SEM(P) and a user-specified objective function Obj, and yields a new semantics that realizes the objective function within the framework of preferred models identified already by SEM(P) in different ways. Thus, the user who may or may not know anything about logic programming has considerable flexibility in making the system reflect her own objectives by building ``on top'' of existing semantics known to the system. In addition to the declarative semantics characterization, we provide a complete complexity analysis and algorithms to compute optimal models under varied conditions when SEM(P) is the stable model semantics, the minimal models semantics, and the all-models semantics.en-USTechnical Report