Shared Landscapes, Shared Consequences: A Study of Human and Wildlife Interactions in the DMV

dc.contributor.advisorMullinax, Jennifer Men_US
dc.contributor.advisorGallo, Travisen_US
dc.contributor.authorPayne, Matthew Hamiltonen_US
dc.contributor.departmentEnvironmental Science and Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-01T06:04:17Z
dc.date.issued2026en_US
dc.description.abstractUrbanization is rapidly reshaping wildlife behavior, increasing interactions between humans and wildlife, and complicating management and disease mitigation efforts. This analysis examines how urban environments influence wildlife movement, disease dynamics, and responses to human recreation, with a focus on white-tailed deer and other common urban mammals. In my first chapter, I investigated the movement patterns of white-tailed deer in urban environments to better understand how they utilize and traverse residential and natural spaces. As deer populations expand in developed areas, understanding their movement patterns becomes critical for managing zoonotic risks such as SARS-CoV-2. Deer were captured with drop-nets in urban parks in the Washington metropolitan area and fitted with GPS collars that recorded locations every 30 minutes. Spatial analysis of the GPS position data from the collars included a Step Selection Function model built with environmental and anthropogenic covariates, and a Brownian Bridge Movement model with isopleths at 50% and 95% levels. This analysis revealed how deer navigate urban spaces and which landscape features may influence their movement, providing insight into potential pathways for disease spread and opportunities for targeted management. In my second chapter, I evaluated how human recreation influences wildlife behavior in urban parks. Specifically, does on and off-trail human activity affect the timing of activity and the daily detection of white-tailed deer, raccoons, red foxes, and coyotes? Using trail camera data, wildlife responses to human presence were analyzed with Cox proportional hazards models and generalized linear mixed models. This analysis revealed how increased human foot traffic in parks can alter both spatial use and timing of wildlife activity. Together, these findings provide insight into how wildlife adapt to urban pressures and offer guidance on managing human–wildlife interactions and mitigating disease-transmission risks in increasingly urbanized landscapes.en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/9pac-zn25
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/35560
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledEnvironmental scienceen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledHuman-wildlife interactionsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledSARS-Cov-2en_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledUrbanen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledWhite-tailed deeren_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledWildlife managementen_US
dc.titleShared Landscapes, Shared Consequences: A Study of Human and Wildlife Interactions in the DMVen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Payne_umd_0117N_26184.pdf
Size:
2.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format