Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSoergel, Dagoberten_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Xiaolien_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-06T06:15:38Z
dc.date.available2009-10-06T06:15:38Z
dc.date.issued2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/9577
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation research is a multidisciplinary inquiry into topicality, involving an in-depth examination of literatures and empirical data and an inductive development of a faceted typology (containing 227 fine-grained topical relevance relationships and 33 types of presentation relationship). This inquiry investigates a large variety of topical connections beyond <italic>topic matching</italic>, renders a closer look into the structure of a topic, achieves an enriched understanding of topicality and relevance, and induces a cohesive topic-oriented information architecture that is meaningful across topics and domains. The findings from the analysis contribute to the foundation work of information organization, intellectual access / information retrieval, and knowledge discovery. Using <italic>qualitative content analysis</italic>, the inquiry focuses on meaning and deep structure: <underline>Phase 1 </underline>: develop a unified theory-grounded typology of topical relevance relationships through close reading of literature and synthesis of thinking from communication, rhetoric, cognitive psychology, education, information science, argumentation, logic, law, medicine, and art history; <underline>Phase 2 </underline>: in-depth qualitative analysis of empirical relevance datasets in oral history, clinical question answering, and art image tagging, to examine manifestations of the theory-grounded typology in various contexts and to further refine the typology; the three relevance datasets were used for analysis to achieve variation in form, domain, and context. The typology of topical relevance relationships is structured with three major facets: <bold>Functional role</bold> of a piece of information plays in the overall structure of a topic or an argument; <bold>Mode of reasoning</bold>: How information contributes to the user's reasoning about a topic; <bold>Semantic relationship</bold>: How information connects to a topic semantically. This inquiry demonstrated that topical relevance with its close linkage to thinking and reasoning is central to many disciplines. The multidisciplinary approach allows synthesis and examination from new angles, leading to an integrated scheme of relevance relationships or a system of thinking that informs each individual discipline. The scheme resolving from the synthesis can be used to improve text and image understanding, knowledge organization and retrieval, reasoning, argumentation, and thinking in general, by people and machines.en_US
dc.format.extent5429072 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titleRelevance, Rhetoric, and Argumentation: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry into Patterns of Thinking and Information Structuringen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentLibrary & Information Servicesen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledInformation Scienceen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledLanguage, Rhetoric and Compositionen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledPsychology, Cognitiveen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledinformation retrievalen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledknowledge representation & organizationen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledrelevance relationshipsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledrhetoric and argumentationen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledtopic-oriented information structureen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledtopicalityen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record