Skip to content
University of Maryland LibrariesDigital Repository at the University of Maryland
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DRUM
    • Theses and Dissertations from UMD
    • UMD Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    •   DRUM
    • Theses and Dissertations from UMD
    • UMD Theses and Dissertations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    INFLUENCE OF MAP RESOLUTION ON SEASCAPE ECOLOGY OF REEF FISH

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Kendall_umd_0117E_10139.pdf (21.48Mb)
    No. of downloads: 347

    Date
    2009
    Author
    Kendall, Matthew Sayre
    Advisor
    Miller, Thomas J
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Characteristics of benthic maps are controlled by the spatial and thematic resolutions used in map production. The implications of these production decisions on the inferences that can be drawn from the maps are poorly understood. I addressed this need by quantifying the differences among common map types, considering how map type affects inferences of fish and benthic communities at the patch level, and then evaluating the influence of map type on ecological neighborhood analysis of reef fish. Results indicated that hard bottom types, especially patch reefs and colonized pavement, were among the most sensitive to changes in spatial resolution of maps. In contrast, linear reef and continuous seagrass features were characterized quite consistently regardless of spatial resolution. Multivariate analyses indicated that both the fish assemblages and benthic characteristics of reef types overlapped considerably. In contrast, shelf position (inside versus outside of lagoons) showed clear differences in both environmental variables and fish assemblage composition. In general, the results of multivariate analyses suggest that knowledge of the overall fish assemblage or fine-scale environmental characteristics could not be used to predict reef type or vice versa. Furthermore, spatial scale of benthic maps did not affect results when analyses were conducted at the patch level. In addition, a multi-scale landscape analysis was conducted wherein correlations between fish assemblages and surrounding landscape variables were measured using univariate linear regression for a range of scales between 25 and 800 m. The strength of the associations as a function of scale exhibited one of 6 response curve forms and was used to identify the scale that best correlates fish with their surrounding habitat. In these analyses, individual landscape variables explained a maximum of only 25% of the variability in fish distributions. Use of different input maps in many of these analyses resulted in a changed perception of either the strength of peak correlation at a given scale, or the scale at which peak correlations occurred. Overall, the findings revealed which aspects of coral reef ecosystems are sensitive to map scale and advise scientists and managers on map production and use in similar settings.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1903/9264
    Collections
    • Biology Theses and Dissertations
    • MEES Theses and Dissertations
    • UMD Theses and Dissertations

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DRUMCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister
    Pages
    About DRUMAbout Download Statistics

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility