Skip to content
University of Maryland LibrariesDigital Repository at the University of Maryland
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DRUM
    • A. James Clark School of Engineering
    • Electrical & Computer Engineering
    • Electrical & Computer Engineering Research Works
    • View Item
    •   DRUM
    • A. James Clark School of Engineering
    • Electrical & Computer Engineering
    • Electrical & Computer Engineering Research Works
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    VLSI CAD Tool Protection by Birthmarking Design Solutions

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    c048.pdf (52.12Kb)
    No. of downloads: 759

    Date
    2005-04
    Author
    Yuan, Lin
    Qu, Gang
    Srivastava, Ankur
    Citation
    L. Yuan, G. Qu, and A. Srivastava. "VLSI CAD Tool Protection by Birthmarking Design Solutions," 15th IEEE /ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI (GLSVLSI'05), pp. 341-344, April 2005.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Many techniques have been proposed in the past for the protection of VLSI design IPs (intellectual property). CAD tools and algorithms are intensively used in all phases of modern VLSI designs; however, little has been done to protect them. Basically, given a problem P and a solution S, we want to be able to determine whether S is obtained by a particular tool or algorithm. We propose two techniques that intentionally leave some trace or birthmark, which refers to certain easy detectable properties, in the design solutions to facilitate CAD tool tracing and protection. The pre-processing technique provides the ideal protection at the cost of losing control of solution’s quality. The post-processing technique balances the level of protection and design quality. We conduct a case study on how to protect a timing-driven gate duplication algorithm. Experimental results on a large set of MCNC benchmarks confirm that the pre-processing technique results in a significant reduction (about 48%) of the optimization power of the tool, while the post-processing technique has almost no penalty (less than 2%) on the tool’s performance.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1903/9068
    Collections
    • Electrical & Computer Engineering Research Works
    Rights
    Copyright © 2005 IEEE. Reprinted from 15th IEEE/ACM Great Lakes Symposium on VLSI. This material is posted here with permission of the IEEE. Such permission of the IEEE does not in any way imply IEEE endorsement of any of the University of Maryland's products or services. Internal or personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution must be obtained from the IEEE by writing to pubs-permissions@ieee.org. By choosing to view this document, you agree to all provisions of the copyright laws protecting it.

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DRUMCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister
    Pages
    About DRUMAbout Download Statistics

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility