Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSegal, Jerome M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-01T13:15:00Z
dc.date.available2008-05-01T13:15:00Z
dc.date.issued2005-07-08en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/7951
dc.descriptionWorking Paperen_US
dc.description.abstractAn analysis of Israeli and Palestinian public opinion makes clear that it is politically impossible for either political leadership to agree to the other side having exclusive sovereignty over either the TempleMount or the Old City. (See Negotiating Jerusalem (NJ), by Segal, Levy, Sa'id, and Katz). What is needed is a permanent way of dealing with sovereignty which does not require specifying that one party or the other is the exclusive sovereign.en_US
dc.format.extent31474 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCISSM; 124en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesThe Jerusalem Projecten_US
dc.titleThe Sovereignity Belongs to God Option for the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif and/or the Old City: An Analysisen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCISSMen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record