Show simple item record

Adapting to Norms at the United Nations: the Abortion-Rights and Anti-Abortion Networks

dc.contributor.advisorConca, Kenen_US
dc.contributor.authorSwinski, June Samuelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-04-22T16:02:48Z
dc.date.available2008-04-22T16:02:48Z
dc.date.issued2007-11-20en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/7634
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation examines the practical effects of international norm construction for social movements attempting to navigate the UN system, specifically UN global conferences. Do norms become ingrained in the practices of intergovernmental organizations to such an extent that they hinder a movement with different norms or help a movement that conforms to them? In studying the UN and especially UN global conferences on issues of social significance, it has been argued that the norms stemming from classic Lockean liberalism, such as emphasis on individual liberties, a rights-based framework for developing policy, and progress through science and reason, are embodied in the procedures and frameworks of UN global conferences. I compare the strategies and influence of the abortion-rights and anti-abortion movements over time at the UN, particularly through the International Conferences on Population and Development, and trace how each movement has adjusted its strategies to accommodate the normative context it has encountered at the UN. I use a combined structural and agency-oriented framework that identifies the concrete mechanisms and processes through which the interplay of movement ideology and institutional-normative context may constrain or facilitate a social movement's actions within the UN system. What I've found in my research is that the abortion-rights network has had more success in actually influencing the debate and changing the language of population policy to reflect their goals, whereas the influence of the anti-abortion network can really only be measured by the language that they have blocked. But it is important to note that both the abortion-rights network and the anti-abortion network have adjusted over time to the UN in terms of their strategies, which is interesting because of the more progressive character of one, and the conservative character of the other. However, the progressive and conservative characters of the two movements still affected how easily each movement adapted to these norms at the UN, and the success of their strategies in that forum.en_US
dc.format.extent2818087 bytes
dc.format.extent40960 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/vnd.ms-excel
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titleAdapting to Norms at the United Nations: the Abortion-Rights and Anti-Abortion Networksen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentGovernment and Politicsen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledPolitical Science, Generalen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledPolitical Science, International Law and Relationsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledUnited Nationsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrollednormsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledtransnational activismen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrollednetworksen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledAbortionen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledsocial movementsen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record