Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBub, Jeffreyen_US
dc.contributor.authorParker, Danielen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-12T05:47:39Z
dc.date.available2006-09-12T05:47:39Z
dc.date.issued2006-07-25en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/3803
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation contests David Albert's recent arguments that the proposition that the universe began in a particularly low entropy state (the "past hypothesis") is necessary and sufficient to ground the thermodynamic asymmetry against the reversibility objection, which states that the entropy of thermodynamic systems was previously larger than it is now. In turn, it argues that this undermines Albert's suggestion that the past hypothesis can underwrite other temporal asymmetries such as those of records and causation. This thesis thus concerns the broader philosophical problem of understanding the interrelationships among the various temporal asymmetries that we find in the world, such as those of thermodynamic phenomena, causation, human agency and inference. The position argued for is that the thermodynamic asymmetry is nothing more than an inferential asymmetry, reflecting a distinction between the inferences made towards the past and the future. As such, it cannot be used to derive a genuine physical asymmetry. At most, an inferential asymmetry can provide evidence for an asymmetry not itself forthcoming from the formalism of statistical mechanics. The approach offered here utilises an epistemic, information-theoretic interpretation of thermodynamics applied to individual "branch" systems in order to ground irreversible thermodynamic behaviour (Branch systems are thermodynamic systems quasi-isolated from their environments for short periods of time). I argue that such an interpretation solves the reversibility objection by treating thermodynamics as part of a more general theory of statistical inference supported by information theory and developed in the context of thermodynamics by E.T. Jaynes. It is maintained that by using an epistemic interpretation of probability (where the probabilities reflect one's knowledge about a thermodynamic system rather than a property of the system itself), the reversibility objection can be disarmed by severing the link between the actual history of a thermodynamic system and its statistical mechanical description. Further, novel and independent arguments to ground the veracity of records in the face of the reversibility objection are developed. Additionally, it is argued that the information-theoretic approach offered here provides a clearer picture of the reduction of the thermodynamic entropy to its statistical mechanical basis than other extant proposals.en_US
dc.format.extent2456815 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.titleThermodynamics, Reversibility and Jaynes' Approach to Statistical Mechanicsen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentPhilosophyen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledPhilosophyen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledPhysics, Generalen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledHistory of Scienceen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledEntropyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledReversibility Objectionen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledEpistemic Probabilityen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledRecordsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledBranch Systemsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledTemporal Asymmetryen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record