University of Maryland LibrariesDigital Repository at the University of Maryland
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DRUM
    • Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland
    • Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland Research Works
    • View Item
    •   DRUM
    • Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland
    • Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland Research Works
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Missile Defense in Europe: Progress Toward an Uncertain Outcome

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Missile Defense in Europe.pdf (146.5Kb)
    No. of downloads: 96

    Date
    2017-01-02
    Author
    Frierson, Nate
    Goren, Nilsu
    Kelleher, Catherine
    Citation
    Catherine Kelleher, Nilsu Goren, Nate Frierson, "Missile Defense in Europe: Progress Toward an Uncertain Outcome," CISSM Publication, January 2017.
    DRUM DOI
    https://doi.org/10.13016/M2H98ZD3V
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Even before its announced completion date of 2018, the European Phased Adaptive Approach (EPAA) to regional missile defense in Europe can declare victory. So far it has been implemented close to schedule and below budget despite continuing problems related to cost, debates about financial burden sharing, and Russia’s warnings about its threat, real or imagined, to European security and stability. Russian aggression in Crimea and Ukraine and its intervention in Syria have helped to shore up broad political support for the project. The sharp tension trajectory of Russian-NATO relations and the need to reassure Eastern European allies does however mean that Russia and a few domestic critics will continue to see EPAA as a political lever to stoke the fires of uncertainty about U.S. commitment and to play on the fears in Eastern Europe of abandonment in their first hours of need should a Russian attack occur. Expansion of the EPAA’s capabilities beyond the current projected capability of the system by 2018 will be difficult given the costs and the competing demands for missile defense assets elsewhere around the globe. Barring any significant ratcheting up of Russian threats and other security risks in Europe, significant expansion of the EPAA is unlikely, but so is any reduction in commitment to the project as it stands now. However, there are many assumptions and challenges still to be discussed and confronted if EPAA is to fulfill all of the political and military expectations set first by the George W. Bush administration and the revised version under the Obama administration. This essay will examine each of these challenges in turn, and gauge the seriousness of the dangers and risks, both political and military, involved. There is little present evidence that the EPAA is at risk of drastic changes to its planned deployment, either in favor of increased capability or a decreased U.S. commitment to fulfilling the promises already made. This is as it should be. The EPAA, to quote Brad Roberts, is not a “fool’s errand.”i What remains to be seen is how the United States and NATO will address the challenges, old and new, that face the EPAA and indeed all aspects of reliance on missile defense to deter and defend against growing threats.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1903/19725
    Collections
    • Center for International and Security Studies at Maryland Research Works

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DRUMCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister
    Pages
    About DRUMAbout Download Statistics

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility