Показать сокращенную информацию

Closing the Gap: Best Practices for Funding Sources for Residential Rehabilitation

dc.contributor.authorTaus, Kathleen Amanda
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-15T21:27:02Z
dc.date.available2015-12-15T21:27:02Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/M24120
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/17183
dc.descriptionAdvisory Committee: Dennis Pogue and Constance Ramirezen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores the history of preservation financing and the different financing structures currently available for owner-occupied housing across the nation. While there is a federal program for commercial structures, no such program exists for owner-occupied housing. This has restricted the availability of rehabilitation funds needed to increase the nation’s viable housing stock. A variety of programs are available from government agencies, from the non-profit sector, and as a result of partnerships between the two. The recommendations from this paper take into account best practices from current programs to propose a framework that can be instituted nationwide to provide funding options for owner-occupied homes.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectDwellings -- Remodelingen_US
dc.subjectBuildings -- Repair and reconstructionen_US
dc.titleClosing the Gap: Best Practices for Funding Sources for Residential Rehabilitationen_US
dc.typeOtheren_US
dc.relation.isAvailableAtSchool of Architecture, Planning, & Preservation
dc.relation.isAvailableAtHistoric Preservation Program
dc.relation.isAvailableAtDigital Repository at the University of Maryland
dc.relation.isAvailableAtUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md)


Файлы в этом документе

Thumbnail

Данный элемент включен в следующие коллекции

Показать сокращенную информацию