Show simple item record

What Matters: An Analysis of Victim Satisfaction in a Procedural Justice Framework

dc.contributor.advisorSimpson, Sally Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorFisher, Cortneyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-25T05:31:37Z
dc.date.available2015-06-25T05:31:37Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifierhttps://doi.org/10.13016/M2Z33H
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1903/16403
dc.description.abstractThe discipline of criminology and criminal justice tends to focus on the offender. However, the victim's cooperation with authorities, which often begins with a willingness to report the crime, is central to a successful investigation and prosecution. Yet, the crime victim exists today on the outskirts of the criminal justice system, limited in their role by the same authorities that need them to help. Despite increasingly retributive policies toward offenders, victims remain as unsatisfied with the criminal justice system as they were prior to the policy changes. This study explores the different policies and practices of criminal justice system actors that contribute to satisfaction for the victim. Using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression, elements of procedural justice are examined to determine if providing victims with procedure and a consistent sense of process creates satisfaction. Procedural justice is then examined in conjunction with distributive justice to determine if there are independent or interactive effects between the two. Study participants included 1,308 victims of violent crime, who experienced a range of violent crimes. Victim satisfaction was measured as a scale variable, averaging the victim's level of satisfaction across four distinct periods of the criminal investigation and prosecution. As expected, components of the system that granted the victim representation and a sense of accuracy in the process created a higher level of satisfaction for the victim. Also as expected, these variables remained important to the victim's satisfaction even when distributive justice variables were included. Unexpectedly, however, the variables that measured ethicality were unrelated to the victim's satisfaction, nor was sentence severity. Theoretical and policy implications, as well as directions for future research, are offered. Study limitations, including the limited generalizability of the sample, also are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleWhat Matters: An Analysis of Victim Satisfaction in a Procedural Justice Frameworken_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US
dc.contributor.publisherDigital Repository at the University of Marylanden_US
dc.contributor.publisherUniversity of Maryland (College Park, Md.)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentCriminology and Criminal Justiceen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledCriminologyen_US
dc.subject.pqcontrolledPublic policyen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolleddistributive justiceen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledprocedural justiceen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledvictimsen_US
dc.subject.pquncontrolledvictim satisfactionen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record