Skip to content
University of Maryland LibrariesDigital Repository at the University of Maryland
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   DRUM
    • University Libraries
    • Library Faculty/Staff Scholarship and Research
    • Library Faculty/Staff Scholarship and Research
    • View Item
    •   DRUM
    • University Libraries
    • Library Faculty/Staff Scholarship and Research
    • Library Faculty/Staff Scholarship and Research
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparison of the contributions of CAPLUS and MEDLINE to the performance of SciFinder in retrieving the drug literature

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Baykoucheva_SciFinder_CAPLUS_MEDLINE.pdf (718.7Kb)
    No. of downloads: 372

    Date
    2011
    Author
    Baykoucheva, Svetla
    Citation
    Baykoucheva, S. (2011). Comparison of the contributions of CAPLUS and MEDLINE to the performance of SciFinder in retrieving the drug literature. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 66(Summer).
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    SciFinder (SF) is a platform that provides access to two large databases, the Chemical Abstracts database (CAPLUS) and MEDLINE. This article analyzes and compares the individual and combined contributions of these two databases to the performance of SF in retrieving the drug literature. Test searches in which the names of two individual drugs (lisinopril and lovastatin) and a group of drugs (SSRI antidepressants) were used as keywords retrieved document sets that were analyzed for total and annual literature output, document types, journal coverage, and language of publication. While the total literature output from CAPLUS was larger than the output from MEDLINE (which was attributed to the presence of patents), MEDLINE performed significantly better than CAPLUS in retrieving the non-patent literature. The overlap of documents between CAPLUS and MEDLINE was found to be only 20-24%, depending on the name of the drug used to perform the searches. This article analyzes the strengths and the weaknesses of CAPLUS and MEDLINE and shows how these two databases, when searched together in SF, complement each other in covering the drug literature. In addition to the extended coverage of the literature, SF provides sophisticated (but easy-to-use) refining and analytical tools not available on some other platforms.
    Notes
    Direct link: http://www.istl.org/11-summer/refereed1.html
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/1903/13952
    Collections
    • Library Faculty/Staff Scholarship and Research

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility
     

     

    Browse

    All of DRUMCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister
    Pages
    About DRUMAbout Download Statistics

    DRUM is brought to you by the University of Maryland Libraries
    University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7011 (301)314-1328.
    Please send us your comments.
    Web Accessibility